* [PATCH v2 1/4] io_uring/rw: forbid multishot async reads
2025-02-19 1:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-02-19 1:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] io_uring/rw: don't directly use ki_complete Pavel Begunkov
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-02-19 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence, chase xd
At the moment we can't sanely handle queuing an async request from a
multishot context, so disable them. It shouldn't matter as pollable
files / socekts don't normally do async.
Patching it in __io_read() is not the cleanest way, but it's simpler
than other options, so let's fix it there and clean up on top.
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: chase xd <[email protected]>
Fixes: fc68fcda04910 ("io_uring/rw: add support for IORING_OP_READ_MULTISHOT")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/rw.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 7aa1e4c9f64a..e8efd97fdee5 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -880,7 +880,15 @@ static int __io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (unlikely(ret))
return ret;
- ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
+ if (unlikely(req->opcode == IORING_OP_READ_MULTISHOT)) {
+ void *cb_copy = rw->kiocb.ki_complete;
+
+ rw->kiocb.ki_complete = NULL;
+ ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
+ rw->kiocb.ki_complete = cb_copy;
+ } else {
+ ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
+ }
/*
* Some file systems like to return -EOPNOTSUPP for an IOCB_NOWAIT
@@ -904,7 +912,8 @@ static int __io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
} else if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) {
return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
} else if (ret == req->cqe.res || ret <= 0 || !force_nonblock ||
- (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT) || !need_complete_io(req)) {
+ (req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT) || !need_complete_io(req) ||
+ (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_MULTISHOT)) {
/* read all, failed, already did sync or don't want to retry */
goto done;
}
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/4] io_uring/rw: don't directly use ki_complete
2025-02-19 1:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] io_uring/rw: forbid multishot async reads Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-02-19 1:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] io_uring/rw: move ki_complete init into prep Pavel Begunkov
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-02-19 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
We want to avoid checking ->ki_complete directly in the io_uring
completion path. Fortunately we have only two callback the selection
of which depend on the ring constant flags, i.e. IOPOLL, so use that
to infer the function.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/rw.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index e8efd97fdee5..27ccc82d7843 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res)
smp_store_release(&req->iopoll_completed, 1);
}
-static inline void io_rw_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret)
+static inline void io_rw_done(struct io_kiocb *req, ssize_t ret)
{
+ struct io_rw *rw = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_rw);
+
/* IO was queued async, completion will happen later */
if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED)
return;
@@ -586,8 +588,10 @@ static inline void io_rw_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret)
}
}
- INDIRECT_CALL_2(kiocb->ki_complete, io_complete_rw_iopoll,
- io_complete_rw, kiocb, ret);
+ if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
+ io_complete_rw_iopoll(&rw->kiocb, ret);
+ else
+ io_complete_rw(&rw->kiocb, ret);
}
static int kiocb_done(struct io_kiocb *req, ssize_t ret,
@@ -598,7 +602,7 @@ static int kiocb_done(struct io_kiocb *req, ssize_t ret,
if (ret >= 0 && req->flags & REQ_F_CUR_POS)
req->file->f_pos = rw->kiocb.ki_pos;
- if (ret >= 0 && (rw->kiocb.ki_complete == io_complete_rw)) {
+ if (ret >= 0 && !(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)) {
__io_complete_rw_common(req, ret);
/*
* Safe to call io_end from here as we're inline
@@ -609,7 +613,7 @@ static int kiocb_done(struct io_kiocb *req, ssize_t ret,
io_req_rw_cleanup(req, issue_flags);
return IOU_OK;
} else {
- io_rw_done(&rw->kiocb, ret);
+ io_rw_done(req, ret);
}
return IOU_ISSUE_SKIP_COMPLETE;
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/4] io_uring/rw: move ki_complete init into prep
2025-02-19 1:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] io_uring/rw: forbid multishot async reads Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] io_uring/rw: don't directly use ki_complete Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-02-19 1:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] io_uring/rw: clean up mshot forced sync mode Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Jens Axboe
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-02-19 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
Initialise ki_complete during request prep stage, we'll depend on it not
being reset during issue in the following patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/rw.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index 27ccc82d7843..d16256505389 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
#include "poll.h"
#include "rw.h"
+static void io_complete_rw(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res);
+static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res);
+
struct io_rw {
/* NOTE: kiocb has the file as the first member, so don't do it here */
struct kiocb kiocb;
@@ -289,6 +292,11 @@ static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
rw->kiocb.dio_complete = NULL;
rw->kiocb.ki_flags = 0;
+ if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)
+ rw->kiocb.ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
+ else
+ rw->kiocb.ki_complete = io_complete_rw;
+
rw->addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
rw->len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
rw->flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->rw_flags);
@@ -817,10 +825,8 @@ static int io_rw_init_file(struct io_kiocb *req, fmode_t mode, int rw_type)
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) {
if (!(kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) || !file->f_op->iopoll)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
kiocb->private = NULL;
kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
- kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
req->iopoll_completed = 0;
if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_HYBRID_IOPOLL) {
/* make sure every req only blocks once*/
@@ -830,7 +836,6 @@ static int io_rw_init_file(struct io_kiocb *req, fmode_t mode, int rw_type)
} else {
if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
return -EINVAL;
- kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw;
}
if (req->flags & REQ_F_HAS_METADATA) {
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/4] io_uring/rw: clean up mshot forced sync mode
2025-02-19 1:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Pavel Begunkov
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] io_uring/rw: move ki_complete init into prep Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-02-19 1:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-19 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Jens Axboe
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-02-19 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring; +Cc: asml.silence
Move code forcing synchronous execution of multishot read requests out
a more generic __io_read().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/rw.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
index d16256505389..9edc6baebd01 100644
--- a/io_uring/rw.c
+++ b/io_uring/rw.c
@@ -889,15 +889,7 @@ static int __io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (unlikely(ret))
return ret;
- if (unlikely(req->opcode == IORING_OP_READ_MULTISHOT)) {
- void *cb_copy = rw->kiocb.ki_complete;
-
- rw->kiocb.ki_complete = NULL;
- ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
- rw->kiocb.ki_complete = cb_copy;
- } else {
- ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
- }
+ ret = io_iter_do_read(rw, &io->iter);
/*
* Some file systems like to return -EOPNOTSUPP for an IOCB_NOWAIT
@@ -995,6 +987,8 @@ int io_read_mshot(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (!io_file_can_poll(req))
return -EBADFD;
+ /* make it sync, multishot doesn't support async execution */
+ rw->kiocb.ki_complete = NULL;
ret = __io_read(req, issue_flags);
/*
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups
2025-02-19 1:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] forced sync mshot read + cleanups Pavel Begunkov
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-02-19 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] io_uring/rw: clean up mshot forced sync mode Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-02-19 20:56 ` Jens Axboe
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2025-02-19 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, Pavel Begunkov
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 01:33:36 +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> A respin of the patch forcing mshot reads to be executed synchornously
> with cleanups on top. Let me know if you want me to separate the set,
> as ideally patches should target different versions.
>
> v2: clarified commit message
> + patches 2-4
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/4] io_uring/rw: forbid multishot async reads
commit: 67b0025d19f99fb9fbb8b62e6975553c183f3a16
[2/4] io_uring/rw: don't directly use ki_complete
commit: 4e43133c6f2319d3e205ea986c507b25d9b41e64
[3/4] io_uring/rw: move ki_complete init into prep
commit: 74f3e875268f1ce2dd01029c29560263212077df
[4/4] io_uring/rw: clean up mshot forced sync mode
commit: 4614de748e78a295ee9b1f54ca87280b101fbdf0
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread