public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io-wq: Fix UAF when wakeup wqe in hash waitqueue
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:03:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 5/25/21 11:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Zqiang <[email protected]>
> 
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __wake_up_common+0x637/0x650
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880304250d8 by task iou-wrk-28796/28802
> 
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7
>  print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0x5b/0x2c6
>  __kasan_report [inline]
>  kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8
>  __wake_up_common+0x637/0x650
>  __wake_up_common_lock+0xd0/0x130
>  io_worker_handle_work+0x9dd/0x1790
>  io_wqe_worker+0xb2a/0xd40
>  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> 
> Allocated by task 28798:
>  kzalloc_node [inline]
>  io_wq_create+0x3c4/0xdd0
>  io_init_wq_offload [inline]
>  io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x1bf/0x6b0
>  __io_uring_add_task_file+0x29a/0x3c0
>  io_uring_add_task_file [inline]
>  io_uring_install_fd [inline]
>  io_uring_create [inline]
>  io_uring_setup+0x209a/0x2bd0
>  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0xb0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> 
> Freed by task 28798:
>  kfree+0x106/0x2c0
>  io_wq_destroy+0x182/0x380
>  io_wq_put [inline]
>  io_wq_put_and_exit+0x7a/0xa0
>  io_uring_clean_tctx [inline]
>  __io_uring_cancel+0x428/0x530
>  io_uring_files_cancel
>  do_exit+0x299/0x2a60
>  do_group_exit+0x125/0x310
>  get_signal+0x47f/0x2150
>  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x2a8/0x1eb0
>  handle_signal_work[inline]
>  exit_to_user_mode_loop [inline]
>  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x171/0x280
>  __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work [inline]
>  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60
>  do_syscall_64+0x47/0xb0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> 
> There are the following scenarios, hash waitqueue is shared by
> io-wq1 and io-wq2. (note: wqe is worker)
> 
> io-wq1:worker2     | locks bit1
> io-wq2:worker1     | waits bit1
> io-wq1:worker3     | waits bit1
> 
> io-wq1:worker2     | completes all wqe bit1 work items
> io-wq1:worker2     | drop bit1, exit
> 
> io-wq2:worker1     | locks bit1
> io-wq1:worker3     | can not locks bit1, waits bit1 and exit
> io-wq1             | exit and free io-wq1
> io-wq2:worker1     | drops bit1
> io-wq1:worker3     | be waked up, even though wqe is freed
> 
> After all iou-wrk belonging to io-wq1 have exited, remove wqe
> form hash waitqueue, it is guaranteed that there will be no more
> wqe belonging to io-wq1 in the hash waitqueue.

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-26 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-26  5:08 [PATCH v2] io-wq: Fix UAF when wakeup wqe in hash waitqueue qiang.zhang
2021-05-26 15:03 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox