public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring
@ 2020-02-11 20:01 Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: remove REQ_F_MUST_PUNT Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel

This cleans up io-wq punting paths, doing small fixes and removing
unnecessary logic from different submission paths. The last patch is
a resubmission after a rebase bundled into this patchset.

Pavel Begunkov (5):
  io_uring: remove REQ_F_MUST_PUNT
  io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx
  io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq
  io_uring: add missing io_req_cancelled()
  io_uring: purge req->in_async

 fs/io_uring.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: remove REQ_F_MUST_PUNT
  2020-02-11 20:01 [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel

REQ_F_MUST_PUNT is needed to ignore REQ_F_NOWAIT and thus always punt
async if have got -EAGAIN. It's enough to clear REQ_F_NOWAIT instead of
having yet another flag.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 18 +++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 63beda9bafc5..98da478ae56c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -477,7 +477,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_TIMEOUT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_ISREG_BIT,
-	REQ_F_MUST_PUNT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_TIMEOUT_NOSEQ_BIT,
 	REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED_BIT,
 	REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP_BIT,
@@ -513,8 +512,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_TIMEOUT		= BIT(REQ_F_TIMEOUT_BIT),
 	/* regular file */
 	REQ_F_ISREG		= BIT(REQ_F_ISREG_BIT),
-	/* must be punted even for NONBLOCK */
-	REQ_F_MUST_PUNT		= BIT(REQ_F_MUST_PUNT_BIT),
 	/* no timeout sequence */
 	REQ_F_TIMEOUT_NOSEQ	= BIT(REQ_F_TIMEOUT_NOSEQ_BIT),
 	/* completion under lock */
@@ -2246,11 +2243,11 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 		req->result = io_size;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the file doesn't support async, mark it as REQ_F_MUST_PUNT so
-	 * we know to async punt it even if it was opened O_NONBLOCK
+	 * If the file doesn't support async, async punt it even if it
+	 * was opened O_NONBLOCK
 	 */
 	if (force_nonblock && !io_file_supports_async(req->file)) {
-		req->flags |= REQ_F_MUST_PUNT;
+		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NOWAIT;
 		goto copy_iov;
 	}
 
@@ -2335,11 +2332,11 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 		req->result = io_size;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the file doesn't support async, mark it as REQ_F_MUST_PUNT so
-	 * we know to async punt it even if it was opened O_NONBLOCK
+	 * If the file doesn't support async, async punt it even if it
+	 * was opened O_NONBLOCK
 	 */
 	if (force_nonblock && !io_file_supports_async(req->file)) {
-		req->flags |= REQ_F_MUST_PUNT;
+		req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NOWAIT;
 		goto copy_iov;
 	}
 
@@ -4715,8 +4712,7 @@ static void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 	 * We async punt it if the file wasn't marked NOWAIT, or if the file
 	 * doesn't support non-blocking read/write attempts
 	 */
-	if (ret == -EAGAIN && (!(req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT) ||
-	    (req->flags & REQ_F_MUST_PUNT))) {
+	if (ret == -EAGAIN && !(req->flags & REQ_F_NOWAIT)) {
 punt:
 		if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].file_table) {
 			ret = io_grab_files(req);
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx
  2020-02-11 20:01 [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: remove REQ_F_MUST_PUNT Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel

Many operations define custom work.func before getting into an io-wq.
There are several points against:
- it calls io_wq_assign_next() from outside io-wq, that may be confusing
- sync context would go unnecessary through io_req_cancelled()
- prototypes are quite different, so work!=old_work looks strange
- makes async/sync responsibilities fuzzy
- adds extra overhead

Don't call generic path and io-wq handlers from each other, but use
helpers instead

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 98da478ae56c..04680d2c205c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2462,23 +2462,28 @@ static void io_wq_assign_next(struct io_wq_work **workptr, struct io_kiocb *nxt)
 	}
 }
 
-static void io_fsync_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+static void __io_fsync(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
-	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
 	loff_t end = req->sync.off + req->sync.len;
-	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (io_req_cancelled(req))
-		return;
-
 	ret = vfs_fsync_range(req->file, req->sync.off,
 				end > 0 ? end : LLONG_MAX,
 				req->sync.flags & IORING_FSYNC_DATASYNC);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
 	io_cqring_add_event(req, ret);
-	io_put_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
+	io_put_req_find_next(req, nxt);
+}
+
+static void io_fsync_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
+	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
+
+	if (io_req_cancelled(req))
+		return;
+	__io_fsync(req, &nxt);
 	if (nxt)
 		io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
 }
@@ -2486,26 +2491,18 @@ static void io_fsync_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 static int io_fsync(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 		    bool force_nonblock)
 {
-	struct io_wq_work *work, *old_work;
-
 	/* fsync always requires a blocking context */
 	if (force_nonblock) {
 		io_put_req(req);
 		req->work.func = io_fsync_finish;
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
-
-	work = old_work = &req->work;
-	io_fsync_finish(&work);
-	if (work && work != old_work)
-		*nxt = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
+	__io_fsync(req, nxt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void io_fallocate_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+static void __io_fallocate(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
-	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
-	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = vfs_fallocate(req->file, req->sync.mode, req->sync.off,
@@ -2513,7 +2510,15 @@ static void io_fallocate_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
 	io_cqring_add_event(req, ret);
-	io_put_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
+	io_put_req_find_next(req, nxt);
+}
+
+static void io_fallocate_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
+	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
+
+	__io_fallocate(req, &nxt);
 	if (nxt)
 		io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
 }
@@ -2533,8 +2538,6 @@ static int io_fallocate_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
 static int io_fallocate(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 			bool force_nonblock)
 {
-	struct io_wq_work *work, *old_work;
-
 	/* fallocate always requiring blocking context */
 	if (force_nonblock) {
 		io_put_req(req);
@@ -2542,11 +2545,7 @@ static int io_fallocate(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 
-	work = old_work = &req->work;
-	io_fallocate_finish(&work);
-	if (work && work != old_work)
-		*nxt = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
-
+	__io_fallocate(req, nxt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2949,21 +2948,27 @@ static int io_prep_sfr(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void io_sync_file_range_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+static void __io_sync_file_range(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
-	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
-	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (io_req_cancelled(req))
-		return;
-
 	ret = sync_file_range(req->file, req->sync.off, req->sync.len,
 				req->sync.flags);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
 	io_cqring_add_event(req, ret);
-	io_put_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
+	io_put_req_find_next(req, nxt);
+}
+
+
+static void io_sync_file_range_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
+	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
+
+	if (io_req_cancelled(req))
+		return;
+	__io_sync_file_range(req, &nxt);
 	if (nxt)
 		io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
 }
@@ -2971,8 +2976,6 @@ static void io_sync_file_range_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 static int io_sync_file_range(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 			      bool force_nonblock)
 {
-	struct io_wq_work *work, *old_work;
-
 	/* sync_file_range always requires a blocking context */
 	if (force_nonblock) {
 		io_put_req(req);
@@ -2980,10 +2983,7 @@ static int io_sync_file_range(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 
-	work = old_work = &req->work;
-	io_sync_file_range_finish(&work);
-	if (work && work != old_work)
-		*nxt = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
+	__io_sync_file_range(req, nxt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq
  2020-02-11 20:01 [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: remove REQ_F_MUST_PUNT Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:21   ` Jens Axboe
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add missing io_req_cancelled() Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: purge req->in_async Pavel Begunkov
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel

If a request got into io-wq context, io_prep_async_work() has already
been called. Most of the stuff there is idempotent with an exception
that it'll set work.task_pid to task_pid_vnr() of an io_wq worker thread

Do only what's needed, that's io_prep_linked_timeout() and setting
IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 04680d2c205c..f3108bce4afe 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -948,6 +948,17 @@ static inline void io_req_work_drop_env(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	}
 }
 
+static inline void io_prep_next_work(struct io_kiocb *req,
+				     struct io_kiocb **link)
+{
+	const struct io_op_def *def = &io_op_defs[req->opcode];
+
+	if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_ISREG) && def->unbound_nonreg_file)
+			req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND;
+
+	*link = io_prep_linked_timeout(req);
+}
+
 static inline bool io_prep_async_work(struct io_kiocb *req,
 				      struct io_kiocb **link)
 {
@@ -2453,7 +2464,7 @@ static void io_wq_assign_next(struct io_wq_work **workptr, struct io_kiocb *nxt)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *link;
 
-	io_prep_async_work(nxt, &link);
+	io_prep_next_work(nxt, &link);
 	*workptr = &nxt->work;
 	if (link) {
 		nxt->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_CB;
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add missing io_req_cancelled()
  2020-02-11 20:01 [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: purge req->in_async Pavel Begunkov
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel

fallocate_finish() is missing cancellation check. Add it.
It's safe to do that, as only flags setup and sqe fields copy are done
before it gets into __io_fallocate().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index f3108bce4afe..b33f2521040e 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2529,6 +2529,8 @@ static void io_fallocate_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
 	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 
+	if (io_req_cancelled(req))
+		return;
 	__io_fallocate(req, &nxt);
 	if (nxt)
 		io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
@@ -2905,6 +2907,7 @@ static void io_close_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(*workptr, struct io_kiocb, work);
 	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 
+	/* not cancellable, don't io_req_cancelled() */
 	__io_close_finish(req, &nxt);
 	if (nxt)
 		io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: purge req->in_async
  2020-02-11 20:01 [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add missing io_req_cancelled() Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel

req->in_async is not really needed, it only prevents propagation of
@nxt for fast not-blocked submissions. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b33f2521040e..a50e7ac41668 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -550,7 +550,6 @@ struct io_kiocb {
 	 * llist_node is only used for poll deferred completions
 	 */
 	struct llist_node		llist_node;
-	bool				in_async;
 	bool				needs_fixed_file;
 	u8				opcode;
 
@@ -1974,14 +1973,13 @@ static inline void io_rw_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret)
 	}
 }
 
-static void kiocb_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
-		       bool in_async)
+static void kiocb_done(struct kiocb *kiocb, ssize_t ret, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(kiocb, struct io_kiocb, rw.kiocb);
 
 	if (req->flags & REQ_F_CUR_POS)
 		req->file->f_pos = kiocb->ki_pos;
-	if (in_async && ret >= 0 && kiocb->ki_complete == io_complete_rw)
+	if (ret >= 0 && kiocb->ki_complete == io_complete_rw)
 		*nxt = __io_complete_rw(kiocb, ret);
 	else
 		io_rw_done(kiocb, ret);
@@ -2274,7 +2272,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 
 		/* Catch -EAGAIN return for forced non-blocking submission */
 		if (!force_nonblock || ret2 != -EAGAIN) {
-			kiocb_done(kiocb, ret2, nxt, req->in_async);
+			kiocb_done(kiocb, ret2, nxt);
 		} else {
 copy_iov:
 			ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, io_size, iovec,
@@ -2387,7 +2385,7 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
 		if (ret2 == -EOPNOTSUPP && (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT))
 			ret2 = -EAGAIN;
 		if (!force_nonblock || ret2 != -EAGAIN) {
-			kiocb_done(kiocb, ret2, nxt, req->in_async);
+			kiocb_done(kiocb, ret2, nxt);
 		} else {
 copy_iov:
 			ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, io_size, iovec,
@@ -4523,7 +4521,6 @@ static void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
 	}
 
 	if (!ret) {
-		req->in_async = true;
 		do {
 			ret = io_issue_sqe(req, NULL, &nxt, false);
 			/*
@@ -5059,7 +5056,6 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
 			*mm = ctx->sqo_mm;
 		}
 
-		req->in_async = async;
 		req->needs_fixed_file = async;
 		trace_io_uring_submit_sqe(ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data,
 						true, async);
-- 
2.24.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq
  2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:21   ` Jens Axboe
  2020-02-11 20:57     ` Pavel Begunkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-02-11 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring, linux-kernel

On 2/11/20 1:01 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> If a request got into io-wq context, io_prep_async_work() has already
> been called. Most of the stuff there is idempotent with an exception
> that it'll set work.task_pid to task_pid_vnr() of an io_wq worker thread
> 
> Do only what's needed, that's io_prep_linked_timeout() and setting
> IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND.

Rest of the series aside, I'm going to fix-up the pid addition to
only set if it's zero like the others.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq
  2020-02-11 20:21   ` Jens Axboe
@ 2020-02-11 20:57     ` Pavel Begunkov
  2020-02-11 20:59       ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-02-11 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, io-uring, linux-kernel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 848 bytes --]

On 11/02/2020 23:21, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/11/20 1:01 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> If a request got into io-wq context, io_prep_async_work() has already
>> been called. Most of the stuff there is idempotent with an exception
>> that it'll set work.task_pid to task_pid_vnr() of an io_wq worker thread
>>
>> Do only what's needed, that's io_prep_linked_timeout() and setting
>> IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND.
> 
> Rest of the series aside, I'm going to fix-up the pid addition to
> only set if it's zero like the others.

IMO, io_req_work_grab_env() should never be called from io-wq. It'd do nothing
good but open space for subtle bugs. And if that's enforced (as done in this
patch), it's safe to set @pid multiple times.

Probably, it worth to add the check just to not go through task_pid_vnr()
several times.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq
  2020-02-11 20:57     ` Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-02-11 20:59       ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-02-11 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Begunkov, io-uring, linux-kernel

On 2/11/20 1:57 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 23:21, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/11/20 1:01 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> If a request got into io-wq context, io_prep_async_work() has already
>>> been called. Most of the stuff there is idempotent with an exception
>>> that it'll set work.task_pid to task_pid_vnr() of an io_wq worker thread
>>>
>>> Do only what's needed, that's io_prep_linked_timeout() and setting
>>> IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND.
>>
>> Rest of the series aside, I'm going to fix-up the pid addition to
>> only set if it's zero like the others.
> 
> IMO, io_req_work_grab_env() should never be called from io-wq. It'd do nothing
> good but open space for subtle bugs. And if that's enforced (as done in this
> patch), it's safe to set @pid multiple times.

I agree, it'd be an issue if we ever did the first iteration through the
worker. And it'd be nice to make the flow self explanatory in that
regard.

> Probably, it worth to add the check just to not go through task_pid_vnr()
> several times.

Good point, that is worth it on its own.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-11 20:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-11 20:01 [PATCH 0/5] async punting improvements for io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: remove REQ_F_MUST_PUNT Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: don't call work.func from sync ctx Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:21   ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-11 20:57     ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:59       ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add missing io_req_cancelled() Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: purge req->in_async Pavel Begunkov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox