From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [POC RFC 0/3] support graph like dependent sqes
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:21:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 12/14/21 05:57, Hao Xu wrote:
> This is just a proof of concept which is incompleted, send it early for
> thoughts and suggestions.
>
> We already have IOSQE_IO_LINK to describe linear dependency
> relationship sqes. While this patchset provides a new feature to
> support DAG dependency. For instance, 4 sqes have a relationship
> as below:
> --> 2 --
> / \
> 1 --- ---> 4
> \ /
> --> 3 --
> IOSQE_IO_LINK serializes them to 1-->2-->3-->4, which unneccessarily
> serializes 2 and 3. But a DAG can fully describe it.
>
> For the detail usage, see the following patches' messages.
>
> Tested it with 100 direct read sqes, each one reads a BS=4k block data
> in a same file, blocks are not overlapped. These sqes form a graph:
> 2
> 3
> 1 --> 4 --> 100
> ...
> 99
>
> This is an extreme case, just to show the idea.
>
> results below:
> io_link:
> IOPS: 15898251
> graph_link:
> IOPS: 29325513
> io_link:
> IOPS: 16420361
> graph_link:
> IOPS: 29585798
> io_link:
> IOPS: 18148820
> graph_link:
> IOPS: 27932960
Hmm, what do we compare here? IIUC,
"io_link" is a huge link of 100 requests. Around 15898251 IOPS
"graph_link" is a graph of diameter 3. Around 29585798 IOPS
Is that right? If so it'd more more fair to compare with a
similar graph-like scheduling on the userspace side.
submit(req={1});
wait(nr=1);
submit({2-99});
wait(nr=98);
submit(req={100});
wait(nr=1);
> Tested many times, numbers are not very stable but shows the difference.
>
> something to concern:
> 1. overhead to the hot path: several IF checks
> 2. many memory allocations
> 3. many atomic_read/inc/dec stuff
>
> many things to be done:
> 1. cancellation, failure path
> 2. integrate with other features.
> 3. maybe need some cache design to overcome the overhead of memory
> allcation
> 4. some thing like topological sorting to avoid rings in the graph
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Hao Xu (3):
> io_uring: add data structure for graph sqe feature
> io_uring: implement new sqe opcode to build graph like links
> io_uring: implement logic of IOSQE_GRAPH request
>
> fs/io_uring.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 9 ++
> 2 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-14 5:57 [POC RFC 0/3] support graph like dependent sqes Hao Xu
2021-12-14 5:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: add data structure for graph sqe feature Hao Xu
2021-12-14 5:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: implement new sqe opcode to build graph like links Hao Xu
2021-12-14 5:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: implement logic of IOSQE_GRAPH request Hao Xu
2021-12-14 15:21 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-12-14 16:53 ` [POC RFC 0/3] support graph like dependent sqes Hao Xu
2021-12-14 18:16 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-16 16:55 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-17 19:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-18 6:57 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-21 16:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-23 4:14 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-23 10:06 ` Christian Dietrich
2021-12-27 3:27 ` Hao Xu
2021-12-27 5:49 ` Christian Dietrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox