Re: [PATCH] io_uring/cmd_net: split ioctl code out of io_uring_cmd_sock()

["Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen" <ast@fiberby.net>]

On 2/16/26 5:46 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/16/26 9:03 AM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
>> io_uring_cmd_sock() originally supported two ioctl-based cmd_op
>> operations. Over time, additional operations were added with tail calls
>> to their helpers.
>>
>> This approach resulted in the new operations sharing an ioctl check
>> with the original operations.
>>
>> io_uring_cmd_sock() now supports 6 operations, so let's move the
>> implementation of the original two into their own helper, reducing
>> io_uring_cmd_sock() to a simple dispatcher.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@fiberby.net>
>> ---
>>
>> Jens, I'm used to net -> net-next taking a week, as it only happens
>> through Linus' tree.
> 
> Looks good to me - since this is just a cleanup, let's defer to 7.1.
> I'll kick that off in a week or so, at which point I'll pick this one
> up too.

Thank you, and sorry for posting during the merge window, I always
intended this for 7.1. I just took it as an invite that you merged into
for-next right after committing my fix to io_uring-7.0, given what I
wrote earlier in the RFC: "I plan to submit v1 once that patch
propagates to for-next.". I wasn't expecting it to happen that quickly.