From: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
To: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] btrfs: make lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need nowait compatible
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 11:38:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H5QnvPNtNq-uvXBsFNT=URXU4pKDaUqZGrf3MPt7VgBSA@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/8/22 3:17 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> >
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:26 AM Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> This adds the nowait parameter to lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(). If
>> the nowait parameter is specified we try to lock the extent in nowait
>> mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/file.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
>> index a154a3cec44b..4e1745e585cb 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
>> @@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ static noinline int
>> lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page **pages,
>> size_t num_pages, loff_t pos,
>> size_t write_bytes,
>> - u64 *lockstart, u64 *lockend,
>> + u64 *lockstart, u64 *lockend, bool nowait,
>> struct extent_state **cached_state)
>> {
>> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
>> @@ -1455,8 +1455,20 @@ lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page **pages,
>> if (start_pos < inode->vfs_inode.i_size) {
>> struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
>>
>> - lock_extent_bits(&inode->io_tree, start_pos, last_pos,
>> + if (nowait) {
>> + if (!try_lock_extent(&inode->io_tree, start_pos, last_pos)) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
>> + unlock_page(pages[i]);
>> + put_page(pages[i]);
>
> Since this is a non-local array, I'd prefer if we also set pages[i] to NULL.
> That may help prevent hard to debug bugs in the future.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
I set pages[i] to null in the next version of the patch series.
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + lock_extent_bits(&inode->io_tree, start_pos, last_pos,
>> cached_state);
>> + }
>> +
>> ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_range(inode, start_pos,
>> last_pos - start_pos + 1);
>> if (ordered &&
>> @@ -1755,7 +1767,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
>> extents_locked = lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(
>> BTRFS_I(inode), pages,
>> num_pages, pos, write_bytes, &lockstart,
>> - &lockend, &cached_state);
>> + &lockend, false, &cached_state);
>> if (extents_locked < 0) {
>> if (extents_locked == -EAGAIN)
>> goto again;
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-08 0:26 [PATCH v2 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] mm: export balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags() Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:18 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] btrfs: implement a nowait option for tree searches Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 13:19 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-08 18:05 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] btrfs: make can_nocow_extent nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] btrfs: add the ability to use NO_FLUSH for data reservations Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] btrfs: add btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:18 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:12 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] btrfs: make btrfs_check_nocow_lock nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:18 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:23 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] btrfs: make prepare_pages " Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:17 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:33 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] btrfs: make lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need " Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:17 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:38 ` Stefan Roesch [this message]
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] btrfs: btrfs: plumb NOWAIT through the write path Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:16 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:44 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] btrfs: make balance_dirty_pages nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:16 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:48 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] btrfs: add assert to search functions Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:15 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 19:10 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] btrfs: enable nowait async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:14 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 19:14 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support " Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox