From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Allow signals for IO threads
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:41:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/26/21 7:46 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
>> root@ub1704-166:~# LANG=C gdb --pid 1320
>> GNU gdb (Ubuntu 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04) 9.2
>> Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
>> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>> Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
>> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
>> Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
>> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
>> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
>> Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
>> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
>>
>> For help, type "help".
>> Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word".
>> Attaching to process 1320
>> [New LWP 1321]
>> [New LWP 1322]
>>
>> warning: Selected architecture i386:x86-64 is not compatible with reported target architecture i386
>>
>> warning: Architecture rejected target-supplied description
>> syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
>> 38 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S: No such file or directory.
>> (gdb)
>
> Ok, the following makes gdb happy again:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp, unsigned long arg,
> /* Kernel thread ? */
> if (unlikely(p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IO_WORKER))) {
> memset(childregs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
> + if (p->flags & PF_IO_WORKER)
> + childregs->cs = current_pt_regs()->cs;
> kthread_frame_init(frame, sp, arg);
> return 0;
> }
Confirmed, it stops complaining about the arch at that point.
> I'm wondering if we should decouple the PF_KTHREAD and PF_IO_WORKER
> cases even more and keep as much of a userspace-like copy_thread as
> possible.
Probably makes sense, the only thing they really share is the func+arg
setup. Hence PF_IO_WORKER threads likely just use the rest of the init,
where it doesn't conflict with the frame setup.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-27 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 0:39 [PATCH 0/6] Allow signals for IO threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 1/8] io_uring: handle signals for IO threads like a normal thread Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] kernel: unmask SIGSTOP for IO threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 13:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-26 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:23 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 18:01 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 18:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-01 14:53 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] Revert "signal: don't allow sending any signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads" Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] Revert "kernel: treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for ptrace/signals" Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] Revert "kernel: freezer should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for freezing" Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 0:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] Revert "signal: don't allow STOP on PF_IO_WORKER threads" Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2021-03-26 12:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] Allow signals for IO threads Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 13:31 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:38 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:43 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 14:45 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 14:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:55 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:08 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:10 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:11 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 15:04 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-26 15:09 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-26 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-27 1:46 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-27 16:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-04-01 14:58 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-04-01 15:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-01 16:00 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-04-01 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-03 0:48 ` Stefan Metzmacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox