public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Tony Solomonik <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add support for truncate
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:10:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 1/22/24 12:37 PM, Tony Solomonik wrote:
> Libraries that are built on io_uring currently need to maintain a
> separate thread pool implementation when they want to truncate a file.

In general, I think we should just make this one opcode, and then
require fd to be -1 for the truncate case (with path in addr, like you
have, or have a valid fd and NULL addr for the fruncate case. Then at
least we don't waste two opcodes on essentially the same functionality.
One minor code comment, which applies to both patches:

> +int io_truncate_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> +{
> +	struct io_trunc *tr = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_trunc);
> +
> +	if (sqe->off || sqe->rw_flags || sqe->buf_index || sqe->splice_fd_in)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_FIXED_FILE))
> +		return -EBADF;
> +
> +	tr->pathname = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
> +	tr->len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);

This should use offset rather than len, as Breno pointed out.

> +	req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;

Why is this being set? There's nothing to clean up post completion, so
this just slows req completion down for no particularly reason. And the
you can kill the same flag force clear in io_truncate as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22 19:37 [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add support for truncate Tony Solomonik
2024-01-22 19:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: add support for ftruncate Tony Solomonik
2024-01-22 20:12   ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-22 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add support for truncate Breno Leitao
2024-01-22 20:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-01-22 20:12 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-22 20:22   ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-22 20:21 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox