From: Ziyang Zhang <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
Harris James R <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>,
Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] ubd: add io_uring based userspace block driver
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 18:00:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2022/5/17 13:53, Ming Lei wrote:
> +
> +static void ubd_cancel_queue(struct ubd_queue *ubq)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
> + struct ubd_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
> +
> + if (io->flags & UBD_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE) {
> + io->flags &= ~UBD_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
> + io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, UBD_IO_RES_ABORT, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +}
Hi Ming,
When ubdsrv sends STOP_DEV and all active IOs in ubd_drv are done(UBD_IO_RES_ABORT),
there may be still some IOs handled by ubdsrv(UBD_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE not set).
When these IOs complete and return to ubd_drv, how to handle them?
I find that UBD_IO_FETCH_REQ are still set,
so will these IOs be issued to ubdsrv again or canceled?
(I see ubd_drv fails IOs when the daemon is dying
but maybe here the daemon is still alive)
> +
> +/* Cancel all pending commands, must be called after del_gendisk() returns */
> +static void ubd_cancel_dev(struct ubd_device *ub)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
> + ubd_cancel_queue(ubd_get_queue(ub, i));
> +}
> +
> +static void ubd_stop_dev(struct ubd_device *ub)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
> + if (!disk_live(ub->ub_disk))
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + del_gendisk(ub->ub_disk);
> + ub->dev_info.state = UBD_S_DEV_DEAD;
> + ub->dev_info.ubdsrv_pid = -1;
> + ubd_cancel_dev(ub);
> + unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ub->monitor_work);
> +}
> +
> +static int ubd_ctrl_stop_dev(struct ubd_device *ub)
> +{
> + ubd_stop_dev(ub);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 5:53 [PATCH V2 0/1] ubd: add io_uring based userspace block driver Ming Lei
2022-05-17 5:53 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Ming Lei
2022-05-17 10:00 ` Ziyang Zhang [this message]
2022-05-17 12:55 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-18 5:53 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-05-17 8:01 ` [PATCH V2 0/1] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-17 14:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-18 7:09 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-18 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-18 12:53 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-18 15:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-19 2:42 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-19 9:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-18 6:38 ` Liu Xiaodong
2022-05-18 13:18 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-23 14:56 ` Liu Xiaodong
2022-05-24 2:59 ` Ming Lei
2022-05-18 9:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-19 13:33 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55d724a8-ed7d-ae92-ca6d-3582e13587db@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox