public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <[email protected]>
To: "Jens Axboe" <[email protected]>, "Christian Brauner" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_WAITID support
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 09:12:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, at 22:14, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/14/23 12:33?PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, at 17:47, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:18:13PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>> Does this require argument conversion for compat tasks?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even without the rusage argument, I think the siginfo
>>>>>> remains incompatible with 32-bit tasks, unfortunately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm yes good point, if compat_siginfo and siginfo are different, then it
>>>>> does need handling for that. Would be a trivial addition, I'll make that
>>>>> change. Thanks Arnd!
>>>>
>>>> Should be fixed in the current version:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/commit/?h=io_uring-waitid&id=08f3dc9b7cedbd20c0f215f25c9a7814c6c601cc
>>>
>>> In kernel/signal.c in pidfd_send_signal() we have
>>> copy_siginfo_from_user_any() it seems that a similar version
>>> copy_siginfo_to_user_any() might be something to consider. We do have
>>> copy_siginfo_to_user32() and copy_siginfo_to_user(). But I may lack
>>> context why this wouldn't work here.
>> 
>> We could add a copy_siginfo_to_user_any(), but I think open-coding
>> it is easier here, since the in_compat_syscall() check does not
>> work inside of the io_uring kernel thread, it has to be
>> "if (req->ctx->compat)" in order to match the wordsize of the task
>> that started the request.
>
> Yeah, unifying this stuff did cross my mind when adding another one.
> Which I think could still be done, you'd just need to pass in a 'compat'
> parameter similar to how it's done for iovec importing.
>
> But if it's ok with everybody I'd rather do that as a cleanup post this.

Sure, keeping that separate seem best.

Looking at what copy_siginfo_from_user_any() actually does, I don't
even think it's worth adapting copy_siginfo_to_user_any() for io_uring,
since it's already just a trivial wrapper, and adding another
argument would add more complexity overall than it saves.

      Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-15  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-11 20:43 [PATCHSET 0/5] Add io_uring support for waitid Jens Axboe
2023-07-11 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] exit: abtract out should_wake helper for child_wait_callback() Jens Axboe
2023-07-14 15:31   ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-11 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] exit: move core of do_wait() into helper Jens Axboe
2023-07-14 15:32   ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-11 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] exit: add kernel_waitid_prepare() helper Jens Axboe
2023-07-11 20:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] exit: add internal include file with helpers Jens Axboe
2023-07-14 15:38   ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-14 20:16     ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-14 20:21       ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-11 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_WAITID support Jens Axboe
2023-07-11 21:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-07-11 21:22     ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-11 22:18       ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-14 15:47         ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-14 18:33           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-07-14 20:14             ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-15  7:12               ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-07-15 14:06                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-15 14:34                   ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-15 20:23                   ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-02 23:14 [PATCHSET v2] Add io_uring support for waitid Jens Axboe
2023-08-02 23:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_WAITID support Jens Axboe
2023-08-09 11:27   ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-09 15:11     ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-11 14:16 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Add io_uring support for waitid Jens Axboe
2023-08-11 14:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_WAITID support Jens Axboe
2023-09-09 15:11 [PATCHSET v4 0/5] Add io_uring support for waitid Jens Axboe
2023-09-09 15:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_WAITID support Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57926544-3936-410f-ae0e-6eff266ea59c@app.fastmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox