public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: David Howells <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	Chengming Zhou <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] io_uring: fix IO hang in io_wq_put_and_exit from do_exit()
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:49:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 9/8/23 3:30 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index ad636954abae..95a3d31a1ef1 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -1930,6 +1930,10 @@ void io_wq_submit_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/* It is fragile to block POLLED IO, so switch to NON_BLOCK */
> +	if ((req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) && def->iopoll_queue)
> +		issue_flags |= IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
> +

I think this comment deserves to be more descriptive. Normally we
absolutely cannot block for polled IO, it's only OK here because io-wq
is the issuer and not necessarily the poller of it. That generally falls
upon the original issuer to poll these requests.

I think this should be a separate commit, coming before the main fix
which is below.

> @@ -3363,6 +3367,12 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
>  		finish_wait(&tctx->wait, &wait);
>  	} while (1);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Reap events from each ctx, otherwise these requests may take
> +	 * resources and prevent other contexts from being moved on.
> +	 */
> +	xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node)
> +		io_iopoll_try_reap_events(node->ctx);

The main issue here is that if someone isn't polling for them, then we
get to wait for a timeout before they complete. This can delay exit, for
example, as we're now just waiting 30 seconds (or whatever the timeout
is on the underlying device) for them to get timed out before exit can
finish.

Do we just want to move this a bit higher up where we iterate ctx's
anyway? Not that important I suspect.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-08 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-08  9:30 [PATCH V3] io_uring: fix IO hang in io_wq_put_and_exit from do_exit() Ming Lei
2023-09-08 13:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-09-08 14:34   ` Ming Lei
2023-09-08 14:44     ` Jens Axboe
2023-09-08 15:25       ` Ming Lei
2023-09-15  7:04         ` Jason Wang
2023-09-25 21:17           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-26  1:28             ` Ming Lei
2023-09-26 14:55               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-08 15:46   ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-09  1:43     ` Ming Lei
2023-09-13 12:53       ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox