From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] io_uring/netcmd: add tx timestamping cmd support
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:25:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <584526c3-79f3-42f2-9c6e-4e55ad81b90c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6840ec0b351ee_1af4929492@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
On 05/06/2025 01:59, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Add a new socket command which returns tx time stamps to the user. It
>> provide an alternative to the existing error queue recvmsg interface.
>> The command works in a polled multishot mode, which means io_uring will
>> poll the socket and keep posting timestamps until the request is
>> cancelled or fails in any other way (e.g. with no space in the CQ). It
>> reuses the net infra and grabs timestamps from the socket's error queue.
>>
>> The command requires IORING_SETUP_CQE32. All non-final CQEs (marked with
>> IORING_CQE_F_MORE) have cqe->res set to the tskey, and the upper 16 bits
>> of cqe->flags keep tstype (i.e. offset by IORING_CQE_BUFFER_SHIFT). The
>> timevalue is store in the upper part of the extended CQE. The final
>> completion won't have IORING_CQR_F_MORE and will have cqe->res storing
>> 0/error.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 6 +++
>> io_uring/cmd_net.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>> index cfd17e382082..0bc156eb96d4 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>> @@ -960,6 +960,11 @@ struct io_uring_recvmsg_out {
>> __u32 flags;
>> };
>>
>> +struct io_timespec {
>> + __u64 tv_sec;
>> + __u64 tv_nsec;
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * Argument for IORING_OP_URING_CMD when file is a socket
>> */
>> @@ -968,6 +973,7 @@ enum io_uring_socket_op {
>> SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ,
>> SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT,
>> SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT,
>> + SOCKET_URING_OP_TX_TIMESTAMP,
>> };
>>
>> /* Zero copy receive refill queue entry */
>> diff --git a/io_uring/cmd_net.c b/io_uring/cmd_net.c
>> index e99170c7d41a..dae59aea5847 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/cmd_net.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/cmd_net.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>> #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>> #include <linux/io_uring/net.h>
>> +#include <linux/errqueue.h>
>> #include <net/sock.h>
>>
>> #include "uring_cmd.h"
>> @@ -51,6 +52,80 @@ static inline int io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
>> optlen);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool io_process_timestamp_skb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct sock *sk,
>> + struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned issue_flags)
>> +{
>> + struct sock_exterr_skb *serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
>> + struct io_uring_cqe cqe[2];
>> + struct io_timespec *iots;
>> + struct timespec64 ts;
>> + u32 tskey;
>> +
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe) != sizeof(struct io_timespec));
>> +
>> + if (!skb_get_tx_timestamp(skb, sk, &ts))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + tskey = serr->ee.ee_data;
>> +
>> + cqe->user_data = 0;
>> + cqe->res = tskey;
>> + cqe->flags = IORING_CQE_F_MORE;
>> + cqe->flags |= (u32)serr->ee.ee_info << IORING_CQE_BUFFER_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + iots = (struct io_timespec *)&cqe[1];
>> + iots->tv_sec = ts.tv_sec;
>> + iots->tv_nsec = ts.tv_nsec;
>
> skb_get_tx_timestamp loses the information whether this is a
> software or a hardware timestamp. Is that loss problematic?
>
> If a process only requests one type of timestamp, it will not be.
>
> But when requesting both (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) this per cqe
> annotation may be necessary.
skb_has_tx_timestamp() helper has clear priority of software timestamp,
if enabled for the socket. Looks like SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW case
won't produce both timestamps with the current implementation. Am I
missing something?
>
>> + return io_uring_cmd_post_mshot_cqe32(cmd, issue_flags, cqe);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int io_uring_cmd_timestamp(struct socket *sock,
>> + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
>> + unsigned int issue_flags)
>> +{
>> + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> + struct sk_buff_head *q = &sk->sk_error_queue;
>> + struct sk_buff *skb, *tmp;
>> + struct sk_buff_head list;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_CQE32))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + ret = io_cmd_poll_multishot(cmd, issue_flags, EPOLLERR);
>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (skb_queue_empty_lockless(q))
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + __skb_queue_head_init(&list);
>> +
>> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irq, &q->lock) {
>> + skb_queue_walk_safe(q, skb, tmp) {
>> + /* don't support skbs with payload */
>> + if (!skb_has_tx_timestamp(skb, sk) || skb->len)
>> + continue;
>> + __skb_unlink(skb, q);
>> + __skb_queue_tail(&list, skb);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + while (1) {
>> + skb = skb_peek(&list);
>> + if (!skb)
>> + break;
>> + if (!io_process_timestamp_skb(cmd, sk, skb, issue_flags))
>> + break;
>> + __skb_dequeue(&list);
>> + consume_skb(skb);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!unlikely(skb_queue_empty(&list))) {
>> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &q->lock)
>> + skb_queue_splice(q, &list);
>> + }
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> +}
>> +
>> int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
>> {
>> struct socket *sock = cmd->file->private_data;
>> @@ -76,6 +151,8 @@ int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
>> return io_uring_cmd_getsockopt(sock, cmd, issue_flags);
>> case SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT:
>> return io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(sock, cmd, issue_flags);
>> + case SOCKET_URING_OP_TX_TIMESTAMP:
>> + return io_uring_cmd_timestamp(sock, cmd, issue_flags);
>> default:
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 8:42 [PATCH v2 0/5] io_uring cmd for tx timestamps Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net: timestamp: add helper returning skb's tx tstamp Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 15:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-06-05 0:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-05 3:51 ` Jason Xing
2025-06-04 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] io_uring/poll: introduce io_arm_apoll() Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] io_uring/cmd: allow multishot polled commands Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] io_uring: add mshot helper for posting CQE32 Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] io_uring/netcmd: add tx timestamping cmd support Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 12:04 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-04 12:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-05 0:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-05 10:25 ` Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
2025-06-05 11:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-05 23:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-06 0:17 ` Jason Xing
2025-06-06 0:02 ` Jason Xing
2025-06-06 8:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-06 8:33 ` Jason Xing
2025-06-06 9:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 8:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] io_uring cmd for tx timestamps Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-04 12:06 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-04 12:38 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=584526c3-79f3-42f2-9c6e-4e55ad81b90c@linux.dev \
--to=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox