public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: kerne test robot <[email protected]>,
	Felix Moessbauer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-6.12/io_uring] [io_uring/sqpoll] f011c9cf04: BUG:KASAN:slab-out-of-bounds_in_io_sq_offload_create
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:03:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 9/16/24 2:35 AM, kerne test robot wrote:
> [ 155.627997][ T6168] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in io_sq_offload_create (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/cpumask.h:562 io_uring/sqpoll.c:469) 
> [  155.628787][ T6168] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888138ecf948 by task trinity-c3/6168
> [  155.629542][ T6168]
> [  155.629806][ T6168] CPU: 1 UID: 4294967291 PID: 6168 Comm: trinity-c3 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-00027-gf011c9cf04c0 #1 074b2dc9794d1910767b5e24d1a9cb7061a66647
> [  155.631255][ T6168] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> [  155.632276][ T6168] Call Trace:
> [  155.632627][ T6168]  <TASK>
> [ 155.632952][ T6168] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:122) 
> [ 155.633418][ T6168] print_address_description+0x51/0x3a0 
> [ 155.634147][ T6168] ? io_sq_offload_create (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/cpumask.h:562 io_uring/sqpoll.c:469) 
> [ 155.634671][ T6168] print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:489) 
> [ 155.635119][ T6168] ? lock_acquired (include/trace/events/lock.h:85 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6039) 
> [ 155.635596][ T6168] ? kasan_addr_to_slab (include/linux/mm.h:1283 mm/kasan/../slab.h:206 mm/kasan/common.c:38) 
> [ 155.636243][ T6168] ? io_sq_offload_create (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/cpumask.h:562 io_uring/sqpoll.c:469) 
> [ 155.636890][ T6168] kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603) 
> [ 155.637320][ T6168] ? io_sq_offload_create (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/cpumask.h:562 io_uring/sqpoll.c:469) 
> [ 155.637873][ T6168] kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:183 mm/kasan/generic.c:189) 
> [ 155.638384][ T6168] io_sq_offload_create (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239 include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142 include/linux/cpumask.h:562 io_uring/sqpoll.c:469) 
> [ 155.638921][ T6168] ? __pfx_io_sq_offload_create (io_uring/sqpoll.c:413) 
> [ 155.639501][ T6168] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142) 
> [ 155.640040][ T6168] ? io_pages_map (include/linux/gfp.h:269 include/linux/gfp.h:296 include/linux/gfp.h:313 io_uring/memmap.c:28 io_uring/memmap.c:72) 
> [ 155.640495][ T6168] ? io_allocate_scq_urings (io_uring/io_uring.c:3441) 
> [ 155.641079][ T6168] io_uring_create (io_uring/io_uring.c:3606) 
> [ 155.641591][ T6168] io_uring_setup (io_uring/io_uring.c:3715) 
> [ 155.642185][ T6168] ? __pfx_io_uring_setup (io_uring/io_uring.c:3693) 
> [ 155.642698][ T6168] ? do_int80_emulation (arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:42 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:97 arch/x86/entry/common.c:251) 
> [ 155.643206][ T6168] do_int80_emulation (arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 arch/x86/entry/common.c:253) 
> [ 155.643675][ T6168] asm_int80_emulation (arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:626) 

The fix for the cpusets dropped checking if the value was sane to begin
with... I've fixed it up with the patch below.

commit 827e3ea024a4facf1d6c8969ae95de939890039e
Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Sep 16 02:58:06 2024 -0600

    io_uring/sqpoll: retain test for whether the CPU is valid
    
    A recent commit ensured that SQPOLL cannot be setup with a CPU that
    isn't in the current tasks cpuset, but it also dropped testing whether
    the CPU is valid in the first place. Without that, if a task passes in
    a CPU value that is too high, the following KASAN splat can get
    triggered:
    
    BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in io_sq_offload_create+0x858/0xaa4
    Read of size 8 at addr ffff800089bc7b90 by task wq-aff.t/1391
    
    CPU: 4 UID: 1000 PID: 1391 Comm: wq-aff.t Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7-00227-g371c468f4db6 #7080
    Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
    Call trace:
     dump_backtrace.part.0+0xcc/0xe0
     show_stack+0x14/0x1c
     dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x74
     print_report+0x16c/0x4c8
     kasan_report+0x9c/0xe4
     __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x1c/0x24
     io_sq_offload_create+0x858/0xaa4
     io_uring_setup+0x1394/0x17c4
     __arm64_sys_io_uring_setup+0x6c/0x180
     invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x260
     el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x158/0x224
     do_el0_svc+0x3c/0x5c
     el0_svc+0x34/0x70
     el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124
     el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c
    
    The buggy address belongs to stack of task wq-aff.t/1391
     and is located at offset 48 in frame:
     io_sq_offload_create+0x0/0xaa4
    
    This frame has 1 object:
     [32, 40) 'allowed_mask'
    
    The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at
     [ffff800089bc0000, ffff800089bc9000) created by:
     kernel_clone+0x124/0x7e0
    
    The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
    page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff0000d740af80 pfn:0x11740a
    memcg:ffff0000c2706f02
    flags: 0xbffe00000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fff)
    raw: 0bffe00000000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
    raw: ffff0000d740af80 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff ffff0000c2706f02
    page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
    
    Memory state around the buggy address:
     ffff800089bc7a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
     ffff800089bc7b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
    >ffff800089bc7b80: 00 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
                             ^
     ffff800089bc7c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
     ffff800089bc7c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3
    
    Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
    Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/[email protected]
    Fixes: f011c9cf04c0 ("io_uring/sqpoll: do not allow pinning outside of cpuset")
    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
index 272df9d00f45..7adfcf6818ff 100644
--- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
+++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
@@ -465,6 +465,8 @@ __cold int io_sq_offload_create(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 			int cpu = p->sq_thread_cpu;
 
 			ret = -EINVAL;
+			if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
+				goto err_sqpoll;
 			cpuset_cpus_allowed(current, &allowed_mask);
 			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &allowed_mask))
 				goto err_sqpoll;

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-16  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-16  8:35 [axboe-block:for-6.12/io_uring] [io_uring/sqpoll] f011c9cf04: BUG:KASAN:slab-out-of-bounds_in_io_sq_offload_create kerne test robot
2024-09-16  9:03 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-09-16  9:09   ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2024-09-16  9:10     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox