From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2A7C001E0 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 01:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233819AbjHOBvx (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:51:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57540 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234124AbjHOBvu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:51:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3B4BE for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6874a386ec7so984164b3a.1 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:51:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1692064308; x=1692669108; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gjJh1H6n4HDecJO/e4d6N0EBFkimFhhLQvDqvGPNpQQ=; b=LLXTK5hD/cetcRfc0dOsWHwgmrWHc72x9/RLAd16QZjkeX4oOo8TS+pw7iSWaDkQJu KOMKooP69Y/2WiI38vhm6o1bM1mGB6HXo/O9uSSCw46Dfy9kjMUcW4Cr0gMWbtwP/L73 O/Ju3kaDs2E/dd1a5SvTdqZBVH4HNqP2TnEVNCBgvEQdyEj0EuHP2RuNF6ETsSKWo311 9qNzLiUKXcCraYt5qd3/tmdqc9iuv2FdWizO2WZuz7184oIQZT/9Ws/d6aQv9WPbj0xS LABSRhkRlevzyXRiiZCVpdzrTqgEdtr49PvNgHk0HRgR0ONjNr93V5qisFDcfz33w0Rz CDJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692064308; x=1692669108; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gjJh1H6n4HDecJO/e4d6N0EBFkimFhhLQvDqvGPNpQQ=; b=awOW+JqSJoGGTuJoS+jIgHcqtjbB/KDx3MtlwRaJ0Bw6BcF/wdlk7kvEr7Tg3+ViDn GLVVOlfihfb2Rv1OeARnQ1Sk1uvm/gxXKlIkxvYUjFJlu2rBKcQURVKFzk5pLFhi8+O3 Pbbjs0TIwaT/YJH4potklgpDBS+AD1YZPrcRf4TQfS/46IeR9DQ372Ae7CKRAX9QDetM Ek0fnUPc+ckOfOaHpIZrAALQl0ASTK0ze3FmUuLNJdLGBw+nQeHTGm7zSJTOnG4lmBAi iPy6f8KnmzLhEDSnzRt4mM5/ClWcz/SNBmk08lub+a2pAUvduYMyQmCBNylmIKXXBgLZ 3wLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxCE02n0iFWn43YE7OJao+Y1WlMfLF9jGL7FUp3FO/BIxIKi80F WZotHnYm+xsMXtuMrcOYo8pQRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG4ucQC4hM9rpUVd+0XSHyHpYDeNAJaZPYaZazhXrh/yZcCvSw9jKvL2m+bXRt4Z4gD+FwQvA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e54f:b0:1b3:d8ac:8db3 with SMTP id n15-20020a170902e54f00b001b3d8ac8db3mr13288794plf.6.1692064308278; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.136] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m11-20020a170902768b00b001bb750189desm10102601pll.255.2023.08.14.18.51.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5a7738df-9a4c-47d1-beea-b2b50d5cef19@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:51:46 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v4] Add io_uring futex/futexv support Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Gleixner , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, andres@anarazel.de References: <20230728164235.1318118-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <87jzugnjzy.ffs@tglx> <875y5rmyqi.ffs@tglx> <9153c0bf-405b-7c16-d26c-12608a02ee29@kernel.dk> <87y1idgo3j.ffs@tglx> <87v8dhgmhc.ffs@tglx> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <87v8dhgmhc.ffs@tglx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 8/14/23 6:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14 2023 at 18:18, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 8/14/23 6:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >>>> We're now resorting to name calling? Sorry, but I think that's pretty >>>> low and not very professional. >>> >>> I'm not resorting to that. If you got offended by the meme which >>> happened to elapse into my reply, then I can definitely understand >>> that. That was not my intention at all. But you might think about why >>> that meme exists in the first place. >> >> It's been there since day 1 because a) the spelling is close, and b) >> some people are just childish. Same reason kids in the 3rd grade come up >> with nicknames for each others. And that's fine, but most people grow >> out of that, and it certainly has no place in what is supposedly a >> professional setting. > > Sure. Repeat that as often you want. I already made clear in my reply > that this was unintentional, no? Wasn't clear to me, and your repeated undertones don't help either. > Though the fact that this "rush the feature" ends up in my security > inbox more than justified has absolutely nothing to do with my > potentially childish and non-professionl attitude, right? I've already made it clear that nothing is being rushed, yet you keep harping on that. It was in my reply, again, though you gracefully ignored that, again. Have we had security issues? For sure, and more than I would've liked. By far most of that is for old kernels, not the current code base. We've made good progress getting that migrated back, and it's always top of the mind when developing new features. If you think I don't take this seriously, then you are ignorant, and suggesting otherwise is slander. And since it's apparently a big problem in your inbox, you will have undoubtedly also seen that we've always been handling these well and expediently. -- Jens Axboe