From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/15] io_uring: move iopoll ctx fields around
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 23:53:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b03cf7e6652e350e6e70a917eec72ba9f33b97b.1692916914.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Move poll_multi_queue and iopoll_list to the submission cache line, it
doesn't make much sense to keep them separately, and is better place
for it in general.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 01bdbc223edd..13d19b9be9f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -256,6 +256,15 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
struct io_hash_table cancel_table_locked;
struct io_alloc_cache apoll_cache;
struct io_alloc_cache netmsg_cache;
+
+ /*
+ * ->iopoll_list is protected by the ctx->uring_lock for
+ * io_uring instances that don't use IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL.
+ * For SQPOLL, only the single threaded io_sq_thread() will
+ * manipulate the list, hence no extra locking is needed there.
+ */
+ struct io_wq_work_list iopoll_list;
+ bool poll_multi_queue;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
struct {
@@ -284,20 +293,6 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
struct wait_queue_head cq_wait;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
- struct {
- spinlock_t completion_lock;
-
- bool poll_multi_queue;
-
- /*
- * ->iopoll_list is protected by the ctx->uring_lock for
- * io_uring instances that don't use IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL.
- * For SQPOLL, only the single threaded io_sq_thread() will
- * manipulate the list, hence no extra locking is needed there.
- */
- struct io_wq_work_list iopoll_list;
- } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-
/* timeouts */
struct {
spinlock_t timeout_lock;
@@ -308,6 +303,8 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
struct io_uring_cqe completion_cqes[16];
+ spinlock_t completion_lock;
+
/* IRQ completion list, under ->completion_lock */
struct io_wq_work_list locked_free_list;
unsigned int locked_free_nr;
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-24 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 22:53 [PATCH v2 00/15] caching and SQ/CQ optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] io_uring: improve cqe !tracing hot path Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] io_uring: cqe init hardening Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] io_uring: simplify big_cqe handling Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] io_uring: refactor __io_get_cqe() Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] io_uring: optimise extra io_get_cqe null check Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] io_uring: reorder cqring_flush and wakeups Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] io_uring: merge iopoll and normal completion paths Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] io_uring: force inline io_fill_cqe_req Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] io_uring: compact SQ/CQ heads/tails Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] io_uring: add option to remove SQ indirection Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] io_uring: move non aligned field to the end Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] io_uring: banish non-hot data to end of io_ring_ctx Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] io_uring: separate task_work/waiting cache line Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] io_uring: move multishot cqe cache in ctx Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-24 22:53 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-08-24 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] caching and SQ/CQ optimisations Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b03cf7e6652e350e6e70a917eec72ba9f33b97b.1692916914.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox