From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Anuj gupta <anuj1072538@gmail.com>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, joshi.k@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing] test/io_uring_passthrough: add test for vectored fixed-buffers
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 07:08:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b728d70-d698-4997-a5a3-5e90ae93daf8@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACzX3Av3G1K0aoZXDOHjfT=Su6G9D-_RyKWjdMwsNpba8T7CFA@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/21/25 4:35 AM, Anuj gupta wrote:
>> LGTM, it's great to have the test, thanks Anuj. FWIW, that's the
>> same way I tested the kernel patch.
>>
>> Somewhat unrelated questions, is there some particular reason why all
>> vectored versions are limited to 1 entry iovec? And why do we even care
>> calling io_uring_prep_read/write*() helpers when non of the rw related
>> fields set are used by passthrough? i.e. iovec passed in the second half
>> of the sqe.
>
> Thanks, Pavel!
>
> Regarding the vectored I/O being limited to 1 iovec ? yeah, I kept it
> simple initially because the plumbing was easier that way. It?s the same
> in test/read-write.c, where vectored calls also use just one iovec. But
> I agree, for better coverage, it makes sense to test with multiple
> iovecs. I?ll prepare and post a follow-up patch that adds that.
We really should ensure it exercises at least the three common types
for iovec imports:
1) Single segment
2) Multi segment, but below dynamic alloc range
3) Multi segment, above (or equal) to dynamic alloc range
These days 2+3 are the same thing, so makes it a bit easier, as we
just embed a single vec.
Bonus points if you want to send followup patches for both the
passthrough and read-write case using eg 4 segments or something
like that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250521083658epcas5p2c2d23dbcfac4242343365bb85301c5ea@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-05-21 8:19 ` [PATCH liburing] test/io_uring_passthrough: add test for vectored fixed-buffers Anuj Gupta
2025-05-21 9:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-21 10:35 ` Anuj gupta
2025-05-21 13:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-05-21 14:20 ` Anuj gupta
2025-05-21 14:24 ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-21 14:05 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-21 14:14 ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-21 14:46 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-21 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-21 13:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b728d70-d698-4997-a5a3-5e90ae93daf8@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=anuj1072538@gmail.com \
--cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox