From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5748C433E0 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 15:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FA5204EC for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 15:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="mFk49No5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728004AbgEQPXC (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2020 11:23:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39940 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727973AbgEQPXC (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2020 11:23:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE45C061A0C for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 08:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id 5so508522pjd.0 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 08:23:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ARcj1uUB48FbteuMdUsFLSwb4pQE/AQvlz9aFRa1Ftk=; b=mFk49No5ggCzuCtMIXt9quTeqnBXTqM6tkZWOR/lJ73iZJoq/oI69Kac4pJ0I43ynh 6pgP0N7dSuD6fP7YFJ27TN8C6nkVy1FlEWAkupwYEiK3eOOIkVDevxQEnrNu5NhgkuSv 019kz+XIxIf/NSaer4esWvHHFeyEobF0S0SnyDzRxkieMgqz6+EHU98iGyDQ/BuOKrsY 4+wPIWpmmK6eDSbaY/eCVTAx65Te7fM2UAgSuNTYTmXkOfkyFu8BVah4H9m8C9Y07l8d 0qzCL4oJ8kEqmysCltdf5r74/kC+vhQODpk2xDrFlI6//Kjj+1mCh7RfH6eggRCi1FNS nUyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ARcj1uUB48FbteuMdUsFLSwb4pQE/AQvlz9aFRa1Ftk=; b=MpHFYG73JjfYSZa41vIlFZ1tr+wud918EmDyJnrCHDilDM1DQoFutTWLMxJvc4kbAg CdxdoRkjjJ/4O0bTBpw8jkrxAY5Y037ctr6v9KiTheqYVXatO4IbJew46FceSk82HZnc sbImTwxaOBrI0PGOUlU4V00DqTgSAAT2mRc6Nyu1MOINM2G0GFlX+QYyEXoE9WGIIXCi rRdTTvK/de+Z2Ut4Z9YKJCp0fQkAsfEsMaXCOO9m4EhYFtO2Qwnl6DxHBcsGWFxEccGQ NvUAuk4DhvAzTzCTgaE01HQZdrZ9ilJFt7B8oLlRL+v1banT5LESzT/AWmLmLzulAZcx CBlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fe0qIWiFQRcpyvprXYjVmS1jxkMULAXZrtiAgIDOfZQYxYfRl nJ5QSIlDg4Ucte6O+9fIXPjhHg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhlCgouCxFptr4eXyvWHC/HFKOrCWJ1DYR/hvquk54lcIgQPa1DipIYjqTKKb8IPEZLRPy8g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1aa2:: with SMTP id p31mr14124234pjp.233.1589728981510; Sun, 17 May 2020 08:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:100e:8c61:91d6:39a4:5ac7:f84a? ([2605:e000:100e:8c61:91d6:39a4:5ac7:f84a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u9sm6407821pfn.197.2020.05.17.08.23.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 May 2020 08:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.7 0/2] fortify async punt preparation To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <5ccf5342-c3f3-feff-f92d-dd580199ce30@kernel.dk> Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 09:23:00 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: io-uring-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 5/17/20 5:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > [2] fixes FORCE_ASYNC. I don't want to go through every bit, so > not sure whether this is an actual issue with [1], but it's just > safer this way. Please, consider it for-5.7 LGTM, applied. -- Jens Axboe