From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/11] io_uring: wake up optimisations
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:46:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60ad9768ec74435a0ddaa6eec0ffa7729474f69f.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Flush completions is done either from the submit syscall or by the
task_work, both are in the context of the submitter task, and when it
goes for a single threaded rings like implied by ->task_complete, there
won't be any waiters on ->cq_wait but the master task. That means that
there can be no tasks sleeping on cq_wait while we run
__io_submit_flush_completions() and so waking up can be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index a6ed022c1356..0dabd0f3271f 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -621,6 +621,25 @@ static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
io_cqring_wake(ctx);
}
+static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+ __releases(ctx->completion_lock)
+{
+ io_commit_cqring(ctx);
+ __io_cq_unlock(ctx);
+ io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
+
+ /*
+ * As ->task_complete implies that the ring is single tasked, cq_wait
+ * may only be waited on by the current in io_cqring_wait(), but since
+ * it will re-check the wakeup conditions once we return we can safely
+ * skip waking it up.
+ */
+ if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)) {
+ smp_mb();
+ __io_cqring_wake(ctx);
+ }
+}
+
void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
__releases(ctx->completion_lock)
{
@@ -1480,7 +1499,7 @@ static void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
}
}
}
- __io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
+ __io_cq_unlock_post_flush(ctx);
if (!wq_list_empty(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs)) {
io_free_batch_list(ctx, state->compl_reqs.first);
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 14:46 [PATCH v3 00/11] CQ waiting / task_work optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] io_uring: move submitter_task out of cold cacheline Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] io_uring: refactor io_wake_function Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] io_uring: don't set TASK_RUNNING in local tw runner Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] io_uring: mark io_run_local_work static Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] io_uring: move io_run_local_work_locked Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] io_uring: separate wq for ring polling Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] io_uring: add lazy poll_wq activation Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] io_uring: waitqueue-less cq waiting Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] io_uring: add io_req_local_work_add wake fast path Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] io_uring: optimise deferred tw execution Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] CQ waiting / task_work optimisations Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60ad9768ec74435a0ddaa6eec0ffa7729474f69f.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox