public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 23:40:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 9/4/21 11:39 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 9/3/21 12:00 PM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> Refactor io_accept() to support multishot mode.
> 
> Multishot with the fixed/direct mode sounds weird (considering that
> the slot index is specified by userspace), let's forbid them.
> 
> io_accept_prep() {
> 	if (accept->file_slot && (flags & MULTISHOT))
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	...
> }

Ah, never mind, it's already there in 6/6

> 
>> theoretical analysis:
>>   1) when connections come in fast
>>     - singleshot:
>>               add accept sqe(userpsace) --> accept inline
>>                               ^                 |
>>                               |-----------------|
>>     - multishot:
>>              add accept sqe(userspace) --> accept inline
>>                                               ^     |
>>                                               |--*--|
>>
>>     we do accept repeatedly in * place until get EAGAIN
>>
>>   2) when connections come in at a low pressure
>>     similar thing like 1), we reduce a lot of userspace-kernel context
>>     switch and useless vfs_poll()
>>
>> tests:
>> Did some tests, which goes in this way:
>>
>>   server    client(multiple)
>>   accept    connect
>>   read      write
>>   write     read
>>   close     close
>>
>> Basically, raise up a number of clients(on same machine with server) to
>> connect to the server, and then write some data to it, the server will
>> write those data back to the client after it receives them, and then
>> close the connection after write return. Then the client will read the
>> data and then close the connection. Here I test 10000 clients connect
>> one server, data size 128 bytes. And each client has a go routine for
>> it, so they come to the server in short time.
>> test 20 times before/after this patchset, time spent:(unit cycle, which
>> is the return value of clock())
>> before:
>>   1930136+1940725+1907981+1947601+1923812+1928226+1911087+1905897+1941075
>>   +1934374+1906614+1912504+1949110+1908790+1909951+1941672+1969525+1934984
>>   +1934226+1914385)/20.0 = 1927633.75
>> after:
>>   1858905+1917104+1895455+1963963+1892706+1889208+1874175+1904753+1874112
>>   +1874985+1882706+1884642+1864694+1906508+1916150+1924250+1869060+1889506
>>   +1871324+1940803)/20.0 = 1894750.45
>>
>> (1927633.75 - 1894750.45) / 1927633.75 = 1.65%
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> not sure if we should cancel it when io_cqring_fill_event() reurn false
>>
>>  fs/io_uring.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index dae7044e0c24..eb81d37dce78 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -4885,16 +4885,18 @@ static int io_accept_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>  
>>  static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>>  {
>> +	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>>  	struct io_accept *accept = &req->accept;
>>  	bool force_nonblock = issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
>>  	unsigned int file_flags = force_nonblock ? O_NONBLOCK : 0;
>>  	bool fixed = !!accept->file_slot;
>>  	struct file *file;
>> -	int ret, fd;
>> +	int ret, ret2 = 0, fd;
>>  
>>  	if (req->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
>>  		req->flags |= REQ_F_NOWAIT;
>>  
>> +retry:
>>  	if (!fixed) {
>>  		fd = __get_unused_fd_flags(accept->flags, accept->nofile);
>>  		if (unlikely(fd < 0))
>> @@ -4906,20 +4908,42 @@ static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>>  		if (!fixed)
>>  			put_unused_fd(fd);
>>  		ret = PTR_ERR(file);
>> -		if (ret == -EAGAIN && force_nonblock)
>> -			return -EAGAIN;
>> +		if (ret == -EAGAIN && force_nonblock) {
>> +			if ((req->flags & (REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT | REQ_F_POLLED)) ==
>> +			    (REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT | REQ_F_POLLED))
>> +				ret = 0;
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>>  		if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
>>  			ret = -EINTR;
>>  		req_set_fail(req);
>>  	} else if (!fixed) {
>>  		fd_install(fd, file);
>>  		ret = fd;
>> +		/*
>> +		 * if it's in multishot mode, let's return -EAGAIN to make it go
>> +		 * into fast poll path
>> +		 */
>> +		if ((req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT) && force_nonblock &&
>> +		   !(req->flags & REQ_F_POLLED))
>> +			ret2 = -EAGAIN;
>>  	} else {
>>  		ret = io_install_fixed_file(req, file, issue_flags,
>>  					    accept->file_slot - 1);
>>  	}
>> -	__io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
>> -	return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT) {
>> +		spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>> +		if (io_cqring_fill_event(ctx, req->user_data, ret, 0)) {
>> +			io_commit_cqring(ctx);
>> +			ctx->cq_extra++;
>> +		}
>> +		spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>> +		goto retry;
>> +	} else {
>> +		__io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
>> +	}
>> +	return ret2;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int io_connect_prep_async(struct io_kiocb *req)
>>
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-04 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-03 11:00 [RFC 0/6] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2021-09-03 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] io_uring: enhance flush completion logic Hao Xu
2021-09-03 11:42   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-03 12:08     ` Hao Xu
2021-09-03 12:27       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-03 13:38         ` Hao Xu
2021-09-17 18:49           ` Hao Xu
2021-09-03 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] io_uring: add IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT for accept Hao Xu
2021-09-03 11:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] io_uring: add REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT for requests Hao Xu
2021-09-03 11:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] io_uring: let fast poll support multishot Hao Xu
2021-09-06 15:56   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-06 17:40     ` Hao Xu
2021-09-06 19:09       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-07  6:38         ` Hao Xu
2021-09-06 19:04   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-07  6:48     ` Hao Xu
2021-09-08 11:21       ` Hao Xu
2021-09-08 12:03         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-08 13:13           ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-09  7:01           ` Hao Xu
2021-09-09  8:29             ` Hao Xu
2021-09-11 10:49               ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-11 20:19                 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-03 11:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept Hao Xu
2021-09-04 22:39   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-04 22:40     ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-09-06 15:34       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-03 11:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] io_uring: enable " Hao Xu
2021-09-03 16:29   ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-04 15:34     ` Hao Xu
2021-09-04 18:40       ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-04 22:46         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-05  7:29           ` Hao Xu
2021-09-05 19:44           ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-06  8:26             ` Hao Xu
2021-09-06  8:28               ` Hao Xu
2021-09-06 13:24               ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-06 12:35             ` Hao Xu
2021-09-06 13:31               ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-06 15:00                 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-06 15:32               ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-06 16:42                 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-04 22:43   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-05  6:25     ` Hao Xu
2021-09-05  8:27       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-03 11:02 ` [RFC 0/6] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox