From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: syzbot <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [io-uring?] KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_task_work_add_remote
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:34:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 7/24/24 12:59 PM, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
> KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_task_work_add_remote
>
> =====================================================
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_local_work_add io_uring/io_uring.c:1193 [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_task_work_add_remote+0x592/0x5e0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1241
> io_req_local_work_add io_uring/io_uring.c:1193 [inline]
> io_req_task_work_add_remote+0x592/0x5e0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1241
> io_msg_remote_post io_uring/msg_ring.c:102 [inline]
> io_msg_data_remote io_uring/msg_ring.c:133 [inline]
> io_msg_ring_data io_uring/msg_ring.c:152 [inline]
> io_msg_ring+0x1c38/0x1ef0 io_uring/msg_ring.c:305
> io_issue_sqe+0x383/0x22c0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1711
> io_queue_sqe io_uring/io_uring.c:1925 [inline]
> io_submit_sqe io_uring/io_uring.c:2181 [inline]
> io_submit_sqes+0x1259/0x2f20 io_uring/io_uring.c:2296
> __do_sys_io_uring_enter io_uring/io_uring.c:3206 [inline]
> __se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x40c/0x3ca0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3143
> __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x11f/0x1a0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3143
> x64_sys_call+0x2d82/0x3c10 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:427
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Uninit was created at:
> __alloc_pages_noprof+0x9d6/0xe70 mm/page_alloc.c:4719
> __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]
> alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]
> alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2321 [inline]
> allocate_slab+0x203/0x1220 mm/slub.c:2484
> new_slab mm/slub.c:2537 [inline]
> ___slab_alloc+0x12ef/0x35e0 mm/slub.c:3723
> __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk mm/slub.c:4759 [inline]
> kmem_cache_alloc_bulk_noprof+0x486/0x1330 mm/slub.c:4831
> __io_alloc_req_refill+0x84/0x560 io_uring/io_uring.c:940
> io_alloc_req io_uring/io_uring.h:393 [inline]
> io_submit_sqes+0x171b/0x2f20 io_uring/io_uring.c:2285
> __do_sys_io_uring_enter io_uring/io_uring.c:3206 [inline]
> __se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x40c/0x3ca0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3143
> __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x11f/0x1a0 io_uring/io_uring.c:3143
> x64_sys_call+0x2d82/0x3c10 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:427
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5924 Comm: syz.0.16 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12268-g7a3fad30fd8b-dirty #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024
> =====================================================
#syz test
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 8e6faa942a6f..198bbbfe465c 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1164,8 +1164,10 @@ static inline void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req,
* previous adds should've tried to wake the task.
*/
nr_tw = nr_tw_prev + 1;
+#if 0
if (!(flags & IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE))
nr_tw = IO_CQ_WAKE_FORCE;
+#endif
req->nr_tw = nr_tw;
req->io_task_work.node.next = head;
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-24 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 10:51 [syzbot] [io-uring?] KMSAN: uninit-value in io_req_task_work_add_remote syzbot
2024-07-24 16:04 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-24 18:37 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-24 18:59 ` syzbot
2024-07-24 20:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-07-24 21:03 ` syzbot
2024-07-24 21:04 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-25 14:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-25 17:32 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox