[PATCH 00/10] some fixing + refactoring batch-free

[PATCH 00/10] some fixing + refactoring batch-free

[Pavel Begunkov]

Firing away... All for 5.9 on top of 5 previous patches fixing link
task submission. I don't think there is much to discuss so didn't
separate into sub-patchsets. Let me know if I should.

Batching free is inteded to be reused outside of iopoll, so
it's a preparation but nice by itself. 

[8/10] looks like it, but double check would be nice.

Pavel Begunkov (10):
  io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()
  io_uring: remove inflight batching in free_many()
  io_uring: dismantle req early and remove need_iter
  io_uring: batch-free linked reqs as well
  io_uring: cosmetic changes for batch free
  io_uring: kill REQ_F_LINK_NEXT
  io_uring: clean up req->result setting by rw
  io_uring: fix missing wake_up io_rw_reissue()
  io_uring: do task_work_run() during iopoll
  io_uring: fix iopoll -EAGAIN handling

 fs/io_uring.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 01/10] io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()

[Pavel Begunkov]

Now io_complete_rw_common() puts a ref, extra io_req_put()
in io_iopoll_queue() causes undeflow. Remove it.

[  455.998620] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[  455.998743] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 285394 at lib/refcount.c:28
	refcount_warn_saturate+0xae/0xf0
[  455.998772] CPU: 6 PID: 285394 Comm: read-write2 Tainted: G
          I E     5.8.0-rc2-00048-g1b1aa738f167-dirty #509
[  455.998772] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xae/0xf0
...
[  455.998778] Call Trace:
[  455.998778]  io_put_req+0x44/0x50
[  455.998778]  io_iopoll_complete+0x245/0x370
[  455.998779]  io_iopoll_getevents+0x12f/0x1a0
[  455.998779]  io_iopoll_reap_events.part.0+0x5e/0xa0
[  455.998780]  io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill+0x132/0x1c0
[  455.998780]  io_uring_release+0x20/0x30
[  455.998780]  __fput+0xcd/0x230
[  455.998781]  ____fput+0xe/0x10
[  455.998781]  task_work_run+0x67/0xa0
[  455.998781]  do_exit+0x35d/0xb70
[  455.998782]  do_group_exit+0x43/0xa0
[  455.998783]  get_signal+0x140/0x900
[  455.998783]  do_signal+0x37/0x780
[  455.998784]  __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x126/0x1c0
[  455.998785]  __syscall_return_slowpath+0x3b/0x1c0
[  455.998785]  do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xa0
[  455.998785]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred completions")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index bf236ba10601..52441f2465fe 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1904,7 +1904,6 @@ static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
 		/* shouldn't happen unless io_uring is dying, cancel reqs */
 		if (unlikely(!current->mm)) {
 			io_complete_rw_common(&req->rw.kiocb, -EAGAIN, NULL);
-			io_put_req(req);
 			continue;
 		}
 
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 02/10] io_uring: remove inflight batching in free_many()

[Pavel Begunkov]

io_free_req_many() is used only for iopoll requests, i.e. reads/writes.
Hence no need to batch inflight unhooking. For safety, it'll be done
by io_dismantle_req(), which replaces __io_req_aux_free(), and looks
more solid and cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 41 ++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 52441f2465fe..28a66e85ef9f 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static inline void io_put_file(struct io_kiocb *req, struct file *file,
 		fput(file);
 }
 
-static void __io_req_aux_free(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static void io_dismantle_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	if (req->flags & REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP)
 		io_cleanup_req(req);
@@ -1514,11 +1514,6 @@ static void __io_req_aux_free(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		io_put_file(req, req->file, (req->flags & REQ_F_FIXED_FILE));
 	__io_put_req_task(req);
 	io_req_work_drop_env(req);
-}
-
-static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
-{
-	__io_req_aux_free(req);
 
 	if (req->flags & REQ_F_INFLIGHT) {
 		struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -1530,7 +1525,11 @@ static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 			wake_up(&ctx->inflight_wait);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->inflight_lock, flags);
 	}
+}
 
+static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	io_dismantle_req(req);
 	percpu_ref_put(&req->ctx->refs);
 	if (likely(!io_is_fallback_req(req)))
 		kmem_cache_free(req_cachep, req);
@@ -1549,35 +1548,11 @@ static void io_free_req_many(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct req_batch *rb)
 	if (!rb->to_free)
 		return;
 	if (rb->need_iter) {
-		int i, inflight = 0;
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		for (i = 0; i < rb->to_free; i++) {
-			struct io_kiocb *req = rb->reqs[i];
-
-			if (req->flags & REQ_F_INFLIGHT)
-				inflight++;
-			__io_req_aux_free(req);
-		}
-		if (!inflight)
-			goto do_free;
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->inflight_lock, flags);
-		for (i = 0; i < rb->to_free; i++) {
-			struct io_kiocb *req = rb->reqs[i];
-
-			if (req->flags & REQ_F_INFLIGHT) {
-				list_del(&req->inflight_entry);
-				if (!--inflight)
-					break;
-			}
-		}
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->inflight_lock, flags);
+		int i;
 
-		if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->inflight_wait))
-			wake_up(&ctx->inflight_wait);
+		for (i = 0; i < rb->to_free; i++)
+			io_dismantle_req(rb->reqs[i]);
 	}
-do_free:
 	kmem_cache_free_bulk(req_cachep, rb->to_free, rb->reqs);
 	percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, rb->to_free);
 	rb->to_free = rb->need_iter = 0;
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 03/10] io_uring: dismantle req early and remove need_iter

[Pavel Begunkov]

Every request in io_req_multi_free() is having ->file, instead of
pointlessly defering and counting reqs with file, dismantle it
on place and save for batch dealloc.

It also saves us from potentially skipping io_cleanup_req(), put_task(),
etc. Never happens though, becacuse ->file is always there.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 28a66e85ef9f..f3c6506e9df1 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1540,22 +1540,16 @@ static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 struct req_batch {
 	void *reqs[IO_IOPOLL_BATCH];
 	int to_free;
-	int need_iter;
 };
 
 static void io_free_req_many(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct req_batch *rb)
 {
 	if (!rb->to_free)
 		return;
-	if (rb->need_iter) {
-		int i;
 
-		for (i = 0; i < rb->to_free; i++)
-			io_dismantle_req(rb->reqs[i]);
-	}
 	kmem_cache_free_bulk(req_cachep, rb->to_free, rb->reqs);
 	percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, rb->to_free);
-	rb->to_free = rb->need_iter = 0;
+	rb->to_free = 0;
 }
 
 static bool io_link_cancel_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -1846,9 +1840,7 @@ static inline bool io_req_multi_free(struct req_batch *rb, struct io_kiocb *req)
 	if ((req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD) || io_is_fallback_req(req))
 		return false;
 
-	if (req->file || req->io)
-		rb->need_iter++;
-
+	io_dismantle_req(req);
 	rb->reqs[rb->to_free++] = req;
 	if (unlikely(rb->to_free == ARRAY_SIZE(rb->reqs)))
 		io_free_req_many(req->ctx, rb);
@@ -1900,7 +1892,7 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 	/* order with ->result store in io_complete_rw_iopoll() */
 	smp_rmb();
 
-	rb.to_free = rb.need_iter = 0;
+	rb.to_free = 0;
 	while (!list_empty(done)) {
 		int cflags = 0;
 
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 04/10] io_uring: batch-free linked reqs as well

[Pavel Begunkov]

There is no reason to not batch deallocation of linked requests. Take
away its next req first and handle it as everything else in
io_req_multi_free().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index f3c6506e9df1..d9dd445e4e57 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1728,17 +1728,21 @@ static void io_req_task_queue(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	wake_up_process(tsk);
 }
 
-static void io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static void io_queue_next(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *nxt = NULL;
 
 	io_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
-	__io_free_req(req);
-
 	if (nxt)
 		io_req_task_queue(nxt);
 }
 
+static void io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	io_queue_next(req);
+	__io_free_req(req);
+}
+
 /*
  * Drop reference to request, return next in chain (if there is one) if this
  * was the last reference to this request.
@@ -1835,16 +1839,19 @@ static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	return smp_load_acquire(&rings->sq.tail) - ctx->cached_sq_head;
 }
 
-static inline bool io_req_multi_free(struct req_batch *rb, struct io_kiocb *req)
+static inline void io_req_multi_free(struct req_batch *rb, struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
-	if ((req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD) || io_is_fallback_req(req))
-		return false;
+	if (unlikely(io_is_fallback_req(req))) {
+		io_free_req(req);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)
+		io_queue_next(req);
 
 	io_dismantle_req(req);
 	rb->reqs[rb->to_free++] = req;
 	if (unlikely(rb->to_free == ARRAY_SIZE(rb->reqs)))
 		io_free_req_many(req->ctx, rb);
-	return true;
 }
 
 static int io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -1910,9 +1917,8 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 		__io_cqring_fill_event(req, req->result, cflags);
 		(*nr_events)++;
 
-		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->refs) &&
-		    !io_req_multi_free(&rb, req))
-			io_free_req(req);
+		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->refs))
+			io_req_multi_free(&rb, req);
 	}
 
 	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 05/10] io_uring: cosmetic changes for batch free

[Pavel Begunkov]

Move all batch free bits close to each other and rename in a consistent
way.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index d9dd445e4e57..f64cca727021 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1537,21 +1537,6 @@ static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		clear_bit_unlock(0, (unsigned long *) &req->ctx->fallback_req);
 }
 
-struct req_batch {
-	void *reqs[IO_IOPOLL_BATCH];
-	int to_free;
-};
-
-static void io_free_req_many(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct req_batch *rb)
-{
-	if (!rb->to_free)
-		return;
-
-	kmem_cache_free_bulk(req_cachep, rb->to_free, rb->reqs);
-	percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, rb->to_free);
-	rb->to_free = 0;
-}
-
 static bool io_link_cancel_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -1743,6 +1728,41 @@ static void io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	__io_free_req(req);
 }
 
+struct req_batch {
+	void *reqs[IO_IOPOLL_BATCH];
+	int to_free;
+};
+
+static void __io_req_free_batch_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+				      struct req_batch *rb)
+{
+	kmem_cache_free_bulk(req_cachep, rb->to_free, rb->reqs);
+	percpu_ref_put_many(&ctx->refs, rb->to_free);
+	rb->to_free = 0;
+}
+
+static void io_req_free_batch_finish(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+				     struct req_batch *rb)
+{
+	if (rb->to_free)
+		__io_req_free_batch_flush(ctx, rb);
+}
+
+static void io_req_free_batch(struct req_batch *rb, struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	if (unlikely(io_is_fallback_req(req))) {
+		io_free_req(req);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)
+		io_queue_next(req);
+
+	io_dismantle_req(req);
+	rb->reqs[rb->to_free++] = req;
+	if (unlikely(rb->to_free == ARRAY_SIZE(rb->reqs)))
+		__io_req_free_batch_flush(req->ctx, rb);
+}
+
 /*
  * Drop reference to request, return next in chain (if there is one) if this
  * was the last reference to this request.
@@ -1839,21 +1859,6 @@ static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	return smp_load_acquire(&rings->sq.tail) - ctx->cached_sq_head;
 }
 
-static inline void io_req_multi_free(struct req_batch *rb, struct io_kiocb *req)
-{
-	if (unlikely(io_is_fallback_req(req))) {
-		io_free_req(req);
-		return;
-	}
-	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)
-		io_queue_next(req);
-
-	io_dismantle_req(req);
-	rb->reqs[rb->to_free++] = req;
-	if (unlikely(rb->to_free == ARRAY_SIZE(rb->reqs)))
-		io_free_req_many(req->ctx, rb);
-}
-
 static int io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
 	struct io_buffer *kbuf;
@@ -1918,13 +1923,13 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 		(*nr_events)++;
 
 		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->refs))
-			io_req_multi_free(&rb, req);
+			io_req_free_batch(&rb, req);
 	}
 
 	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
 	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
 		io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
-	io_free_req_many(ctx, &rb);
+	io_req_free_batch_finish(ctx, &rb);
 
 	if (!list_empty(&again))
 		io_iopoll_queue(&again);
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 06/10] io_uring: kill REQ_F_LINK_NEXT

[Pavel Begunkov]

After pulling nxt from a request, it's no more a link's head, so
clear REQ_F_LINK_HEAD. Absence of this flag also indicates that
there are no linked requests, so replacing REQ_F_LINK_NEXT,
which can be killed.

Linked timeouts also behave leaving the flag intact when necessary.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index f64cca727021..b9f44c6b32f1 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -526,7 +526,6 @@ enum {
 	REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT_BIT	= IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT_BIT,
 
 	REQ_F_LINK_HEAD_BIT,
-	REQ_F_LINK_NEXT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_FAIL_LINK_BIT,
 	REQ_F_INFLIGHT_BIT,
 	REQ_F_CUR_POS_BIT,
@@ -565,8 +564,6 @@ enum {
 
 	/* head of a link */
 	REQ_F_LINK_HEAD		= BIT(REQ_F_LINK_HEAD_BIT),
-	/* already grabbed next link */
-	REQ_F_LINK_NEXT		= BIT(REQ_F_LINK_NEXT_BIT),
 	/* fail rest of links */
 	REQ_F_FAIL_LINK		= BIT(REQ_F_FAIL_LINK_BIT),
 	/* on inflight list */
@@ -1559,10 +1556,6 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 	bool wake_ev = false;
 
-	/* Already got next link */
-	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_NEXT)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * The list should never be empty when we are called here. But could
 	 * potentially happen if the chain is messed up, check to be on the
@@ -1587,7 +1580,6 @@ static void io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxtptr)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK_NEXT;
 	if (wake_ev)
 		io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
 }
@@ -1628,6 +1620,7 @@ static void io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt)
 {
 	if (likely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)))
 		return;
+	req->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_HEAD;
 
 	/*
 	 * If LINK is set, we have dependent requests in this chain. If we
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 07/10] io_uring: clean up req->result setting by rw

[Pavel Begunkov]

Assign req->result to io_size early in io_{read,write}(),
it's enough and makes it more straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b9f44c6b32f1..5e0196393c4f 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2384,7 +2384,6 @@ static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
 
 		kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
 		kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
-		req->result = 0;
 		req->iopoll_completed = 0;
 	} else {
 		if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
@@ -2957,10 +2956,8 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
 	if (!force_nonblock)
 		kiocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_NOWAIT;
 
-	req->result = 0;
 	io_size = ret;
-	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)
-		req->result = io_size;
+	req->result = io_size;
 
 	/* If the file doesn't support async, just async punt */
 	if (force_nonblock && !io_file_supports_async(req->file, READ))
@@ -3054,10 +3051,8 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
 	if (!force_nonblock)
 		req->rw.kiocb.ki_flags &= ~IOCB_NOWAIT;
 
-	req->result = 0;
 	io_size = ret;
-	if (req->flags & REQ_F_LINK_HEAD)
-		req->result = io_size;
+	req->result = io_size;
 
 	/* If the file doesn't support async, just async punt */
 	if (force_nonblock && !io_file_supports_async(req->file, WRITE))
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 08/10] io_uring: fix missing wake_up io_rw_reissue()

[Pavel Begunkov]

Don't forget to wake up a process to which io_rw_reissue() added
task_work.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 5e0196393c4f..79d5680219d1 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2172,6 +2172,7 @@ static bool io_rw_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req, long res)
 	ret = task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, true);
 	if (!ret)
 		return true;
+	wake_up_process(tsk);
 #endif
 	return false;
 }
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 09/10] io_uring: do task_work_run() during iopoll

[Pavel Begunkov]

There are a lot of new users of task_work, and some of task_work_add()
may happen while we do io polling, thus make iopoll from time to time
to do task_work_run(), so it doesn't poll for sitting there reqs.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 79d5680219d1..75ec0d952cb5 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2052,6 +2052,8 @@ static int io_iopoll_check(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned *nr_events,
 		 */
 		if (!(++iters & 7)) {
 			mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+			if (current->task_works)
+				task_work_run();
 			mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 		}
 
-- 
2.24.0

[PATCH 10/10] io_uring: fix iopoll -EAGAIN handling

[Pavel Begunkov]

req->iopoll() is not necessarily called by a task that submitted a
request. Because of that, it's dangerous to grab_env() and punt async
on -EGAIN, potentially grabbinf another task's mm and corrupting its
memory.

Do resubmit from the submitter task context.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 75ec0d952cb5..f4b1ebc81949 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -892,6 +892,7 @@ enum io_mem_account {
 	ACCT_PINNED,
 };
 
+static bool io_rw_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req, long res);
 static void io_cqring_fill_event(struct io_kiocb *req, long res);
 static void io_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
 static void io_double_put_req(struct io_kiocb *req);
@@ -1873,14 +1874,9 @@ static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
 		req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, list);
 		list_del(&req->list);
 
-		/* shouldn't happen unless io_uring is dying, cancel reqs */
-		if (unlikely(!current->mm)) {
+		/* should have ->mm unless io_uring is dying, kill reqs then */
+		if (unlikely(!current->mm) || !io_rw_reissue(req, -EAGAIN))
 			io_complete_rw_common(&req->rw.kiocb, -EAGAIN, NULL);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		refcount_inc(&req->refs);
-		io_queue_async_work(req);
 	} while (!list_empty(again));
 }
 
@@ -2388,6 +2384,7 @@ static int io_prep_rw(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
 		kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
 		kiocb->ki_complete = io_complete_rw_iopoll;
 		req->iopoll_completed = 0;
+		io_get_req_task(req);
 	} else {
 		if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI)
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.24.0

Re: [PATCH 00/10] some fixing + refactoring batch-free

[Jens Axboe]

On 6/28/20 3:52 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Firing away... All for 5.9 on top of 5 previous patches fixing link
> task submission. I don't think there is much to discuss so didn't
> separate into sub-patchsets. Let me know if I should.

Agree, this works fine as posted.

> Batching free is inteded to be reused outside of iopoll, so
> it's a preparation but nice by itself. 
> 
> [8/10] looks like it, but double check would be nice.

Thanks, yes we need the wakeup there.

I have applied this on top, thanks Pavel!

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH 08/10] io_uring: fix missing wake_up io_rw_reissue()

[Jens Axboe]

On 6/28/20 3:52 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Don't forget to wake up a process to which io_rw_reissue() added
> task_work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 5e0196393c4f..79d5680219d1 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2172,6 +2172,7 @@ static bool io_rw_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req, long res)
>  	ret = task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, true);
>  	if (!ret)
>  		return true;
> +	wake_up_process(tsk);
>  #endif
>  	return false;
>  }
> 

Actually, I spoke too soon, you'll want this wake_up_process() to be for
the success case. I've dropped this patch, please resend it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH 08/10] io_uring: fix missing wake_up io_rw_reissue()

[Pavel Begunkov]

On 28/06/2020 17:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/28/20 3:52 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Don't forget to wake up a process to which io_rw_reissue() added
>> task_work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/io_uring.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 5e0196393c4f..79d5680219d1 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -2172,6 +2172,7 @@ static bool io_rw_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req, long res)
>>  	ret = task_work_add(tsk, &req->task_work, true);
>>  	if (!ret)
>>  		return true;
>> +	wake_up_process(tsk);
>>  #endif
>>  	return false;
>>  }
>>
> 
> Actually, I spoke too soon, you'll want this wake_up_process() to be for
> the success case. I've dropped this patch, please resend it.

Oh, a stupid mistake. Thanks for taking a look


-- 
Pavel Begunkov