From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_MKNODAT
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:58:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOKbgA489C=ZS_E6YCBFxo+zYNb5ccE4dfFBntAO=qNH7_Uu=A@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/23/21 7:26 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 6:52 PM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/3/21 6:18 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
>>> IORING_OP_MKNODAT behaves like mknodat(2) and takes the same flags and
>>> arguments.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210514145259.wtl4xcsp52woi6ab@wittgenstein/
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/internal.h | 2 ++
>>> fs/io_uring.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> fs/namei.c | 2 +-
>>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 2 ++
>>> 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
>>> index 15a7d210cc67..c6fb9974006f 100644
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> static bool io_disarm_next(struct io_kiocb *req);
>>> @@ -3687,6 +3697,44 @@ static int io_linkat(struct io_kiocb *req, int issue_flags)
>>> io_req_complete(req, ret);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +static int io_mknodat_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
>>> + const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>> +{
>>> + struct io_mknod *mkn = &req->mknod;
>>> + const char __user *fname;
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_FIXED_FILE))
>>> + return -EBADF;
>>
>> IOPOLL won't support it, and the check is missing.
>> Probably for other opcodes as well.
>>
>> if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> This change is based on some other similar opcodes (unlinkat, renameat) that
> were added a while ago. Those lack the check as well. I guess I'll just prepare
> a patch that adds the checks to all of them. Thanks, Pavel.
>
> Jens, separately it's my understanding that you do not want the MKNODAT opcode
> at all, should I drop this from the subsequent series?
I guess that comment was to my note that the patch with it
doesn't compile, but as it should be already fixed up...
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 5:18 [PATCH v5 00/10] io_uring: add mkdir, [sym]linkat and mknodat support Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] fs: make do_mkdirat() take struct filename Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_MKDIRAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 11:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 6:41 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 11:53 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-24 11:11 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-24 12:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-28 8:17 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-07 14:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-12 12:44 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-07-12 13:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 17:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 0:41 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-23 5:50 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] fs: make do_mknodat() take struct filename Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] fs: make do_symlinkat() " Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] namei: add getname_uflags() Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] fs: make do_linkat() take struct filename Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] fs: update do_*() helpers to return ints Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_SYMLINKAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 5:45 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_LINKAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:48 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 6:09 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 13:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-03 5:18 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_MKNODAT Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-22 11:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 6:26 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 11:58 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-06-24 2:36 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-18 6:24 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] io_uring: add mkdir, [sym]linkat and mknodat support Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-18 16:10 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-21 15:21 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 8:12 ` Christian Brauner
2021-06-22 8:34 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-29 13:06 ` Christian Brauner
2021-06-22 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 8:26 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-21 15:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-21 15:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 11:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-22 17:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 17:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-23 5:37 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 5:49 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-24 2:37 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-24 10:55 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-23 5:35 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2021-06-24 2:37 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox