From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] liburing: add api to set napi busy poll settings
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 19:30:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/2/24 3:46 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/2/24 3:20 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/2/24 1:23 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 13:14 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ah gotcha, yeah that?s odd and could not ever have worked. I wonder
>>>> how that was tested?
>>>>
>>>> I?ll setup a liburing branch as well.
>>>>
>>> It is easy. You omit to check the function return value by telling to
>>> yourself that it cannot fail...
>>>
>>> I caught my mistake on a second pass code review...
>>
>> Oh I can see how that can happen, but then there should be no functional
>> changes in terms of latency... Which means that it was never tested. The
>> test results were from the original postings, so probably just fine.
>> It's just that later versions would've failed. Looking at the example
>> test case, it doesn't check the return value.
>
> Setup a 'napi' branch with the patches, and some fixes on top. It's a
> start... I'll try the example ping test here, just need to get off a
> plane and be able to access test boxes.
Added ipv4 support to the napi example code, and here's what I get.
Stock settings, no NAPI, 100k packets:
rtt(us) min/avg/max/mdev = 31.730/37.006/87.960/0.497
and with -t10 -b enabled:
rtt(us) min/avg/max/mdev = 23.250/29.795/63.511/1.203
So it seems to work fine as-is, with the current branch. I've added some
tweaks on the liburing napi branch, but mostly just little fixes.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-03 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 18:20 [PATCH v9 0/4] liburing: add api for napi busy poll Stefan Roesch
2023-04-25 18:20 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] liburing: add api to set napi busy poll settings Stefan Roesch
2024-02-02 16:41 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-02-02 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-02 17:41 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-02-02 17:48 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-02 20:11 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-02-02 20:14 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-02 20:23 ` Olivier Langlois
2024-02-02 22:20 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-02 22:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-03 2:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-04-25 18:20 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] liburing: add documentation for new napi busy polling Stefan Roesch
2023-04-25 18:20 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] liburing: add example programs for napi busy poll Stefan Roesch
2023-04-25 18:20 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] liburing: update changelog with new feature Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox