Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] net: timestamp: add helper returning skb's tx tstamp

[Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>]

Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/16/25 03:31, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> >> Add a helper function skb_get_tx_timestamp() that returns a tx timestamp
> >> associated with an error queue skb.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>   include/net/sock.h |  9 +++++++++
> >>   net/socket.c       | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> >> index 92e7c1aae3cc..0b96196d8a34 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> >> @@ -2677,6 +2677,15 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
> >>   void __sock_recv_wifi_status(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
> >>   			     struct sk_buff *skb);
> >>   
> >> +enum {
> >> +	NET_TIMESTAMP_ORIGIN_SW		= 0,
> >> +	NET_TIMESTAMP_ORIGIN_HW		= 1,
> >> +};
> > 
> > Can you avoid introducing a new enum, and instead just return
> > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE (1) or SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE (2)?
> 
> I can't say I like it more because TX_{SW,HW} is just a small
> subset of SOF_TIMESTAMPING_* flags and the caller by default
> could assume that there might be other values as well, but let
> me send v5 and we'll see which is better.

This is quite a lot of new timestamping logic for only io_uring as
user, and I don't see any other user of it coming soon. I also see no
easy way to make it more concise, so it's fine. But this at least
avoids one extra new enum.