From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: David Stevens <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix short read/write with linked ops
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:35:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 10/3/22 10:19, David Stevens wrote:
> From: David Stevens <[email protected]>
>
> When continuing a short read/write, account for any completed bytes when
> calculating the operation's target length. The operation's actual
> accumulated length is fixed up by kiocb_done, and the target and actual
> lengths are then compared by __io_complete_rw_common. That function
> already propagated the actual length to userspace, but the incorrect
> target length was causing it to always cancel linked operations, even
> with a successfully completed read/write.
The issue looks same as fixed with
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-6.1/io_uring&id=bf68b5b34311ee57ed40749a1257a30b46127556
Can you check if for-6.1 works for you?
git://git.kernel.dk/linux.git for-6.1/io_uring
https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-6.1/io_uring
> Fixes: 227c0c9673d8 ("io_uring: internally retry short reads")
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <[email protected]>
> ---
> io_uring/rw.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
> index 76ebcfebc9a6..aa9967a52dfd 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rw.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rw.c
> @@ -706,13 +706,14 @@ int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> struct kiocb *kiocb = &rw->kiocb;
> bool force_nonblock = issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
> struct io_async_rw *io;
> - ssize_t ret, ret2;
> + ssize_t ret, ret2, target_len;
> loff_t *ppos;
>
> if (!req_has_async_data(req)) {
> ret = io_import_iovec(READ, req, &iovec, s, issue_flags);
> if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> return ret;
> + target_len = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
> } else {
> io = req->async_data;
> s = &io->s;
> @@ -733,6 +734,7 @@ int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> * need to make this conditional.
> */
> iov_iter_restore(&s->iter, &s->iter_state);
> + target_len = iov_iter_count(&s->iter) + io->bytes_done;
> iovec = NULL;
> }
> ret = io_rw_init_file(req, FMODE_READ);
> @@ -740,7 +742,7 @@ int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> kfree(iovec);
> return ret;
> }
> - req->cqe.res = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
> + req->cqe.res = target_len;
>
> if (force_nonblock) {
> /* If the file doesn't support async, just async punt */
> @@ -850,18 +852,20 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> struct iovec *iovec;
> struct kiocb *kiocb = &rw->kiocb;
> bool force_nonblock = issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
> - ssize_t ret, ret2;
> + ssize_t ret, ret2, target_len;
> loff_t *ppos;
>
> if (!req_has_async_data(req)) {
> ret = io_import_iovec(WRITE, req, &iovec, s, issue_flags);
> if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> return ret;
> + target_len = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
> } else {
> struct io_async_rw *io = req->async_data;
>
> s = &io->s;
> iov_iter_restore(&s->iter, &s->iter_state);
> + target_len = iov_iter_count(&s->iter) + io->bytes_done;
> iovec = NULL;
> }
> ret = io_rw_init_file(req, FMODE_WRITE);
> @@ -869,7 +873,7 @@ int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> kfree(iovec);
> return ret;
> }
> - req->cqe.res = iov_iter_count(&s->iter);
> + req->cqe.res = target_len;
>
> if (force_nonblock) {
> /* If the file doesn't support async, just async punt */
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-03 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-03 9:19 [PATCH] io_uring: fix short read/write with linked ops David Stevens
2022-10-03 10:35 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-10-04 2:17 ` David Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox