* [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk
@ 2022-06-23 8:37 Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-23 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-25 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Yudaken @ 2022-06-23 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe, asml.silence, io-uring; +Cc: Dylan Yudaken
The TP_printk macro's are not supposed to use custom code ([1]) or else
tools such as perf cannot use these events.
Convert the opcode string representation to use the __string wiring that
the event framework provides ([2]).
[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/379903/
[2]: https://lwn.net/Articles/381064/
Fixes: 033b87d24f72 ("io_uring: use the text representation of ops in trace")
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
---
Hi,
I think this probably should get queued up for 5.19 as it can break some userspace
tooling (eg. perf) otherwise.
I've done the rebase here to 5.19, but there will be a conflict with Pavel's
"io_uring: clean up tracing events" if you apply this and rebase 5.20 on it.
Dylan
include/trace/events/io_uring.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/io_uring.h b/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
index 66fcc5a1a5b1..ede64cde1704 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/io_uring.h
@@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_queue_async_work,
__field( unsigned int, flags )
__field( struct io_wq_work *, work )
__field( int, rw )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -168,11 +170,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_queue_async_work,
__entry->opcode = opcode;
__entry->work = work;
__entry->rw = rw;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, %s queue, work %p",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->flags, __entry->rw ? "hashed" : "normal", __entry->work)
);
@@ -198,6 +202,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_defer,
__field( void *, req )
__field( unsigned long long, data )
__field( u8, opcode )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -205,11 +211,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_defer,
__entry->req = req;
__entry->data = user_data;
__entry->opcode = opcode;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode))
+ __get_str(op_str))
);
/**
@@ -298,6 +306,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_fail_link,
__field( unsigned long long, user_data )
__field( u8, opcode )
__field( void *, link )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -306,11 +316,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_fail_link,
__entry->user_data = user_data;
__entry->opcode = opcode;
__entry->link = link;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, request %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, link %p",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode), __entry->link)
+ __get_str(op_str), __entry->link)
);
/**
@@ -390,6 +402,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
__field( u32, flags )
__field( bool, force_nonblock )
__field( bool, sq_thread )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -399,12 +413,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
__entry->opcode = opcode;
__entry->flags = flags;
__entry->force_nonblock = force_nonblock;
- __entry->sq_thread = sq_thread;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, flags 0x%x, "
"non block %d, sq_thread %d", __entry->ctx, __entry->req,
- __entry->user_data, io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __entry->user_data, __get_str(op_str),
__entry->flags, __entry->force_nonblock, __entry->sq_thread)
);
@@ -435,6 +450,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_arm,
__field( u8, opcode )
__field( int, mask )
__field( int, events )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -444,11 +461,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_poll_arm,
__entry->opcode = opcode;
__entry->mask = mask;
__entry->events = events;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, mask 0x%x, events 0x%x",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->mask, __entry->events)
);
@@ -474,6 +493,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_task_add,
__field( unsigned long long, user_data )
__field( u8, opcode )
__field( int, mask )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -482,11 +503,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_task_add,
__entry->user_data = user_data;
__entry->opcode = opcode;
__entry->mask = mask;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, opcode %s, mask %x",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->mask)
);
@@ -523,6 +546,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_req_failed,
__field( u64, pad1 )
__field( u64, addr3 )
__field( int, error )
+
+ __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(sqe->opcode) )
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -542,6 +567,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_req_failed,
__entry->pad1 = sqe->__pad2[0];
__entry->addr3 = sqe->addr3;
__entry->error = error;
+
+ __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(sqe->opcode));
),
TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, user_data 0x%llx, "
@@ -550,7 +577,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_req_failed,
"personality=%d, file_index=%d, pad=0x%llx, addr3=%llx, "
"error=%d",
__entry->ctx, __entry->req, __entry->user_data,
- io_uring_get_opcode(__entry->opcode),
+ __get_str(op_str),
__entry->flags, __entry->ioprio,
(unsigned long long)__entry->off,
(unsigned long long) __entry->addr, __entry->len,
base-commit: c0737fa9a5a5cf5a053bcc983f72d58919b997c6
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk
2022-06-23 8:37 [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk Dylan Yudaken
@ 2022-06-23 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-23 14:59 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-25 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-06-23 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dylan Yudaken, asml.silence, io-uring
On 6/23/22 2:37 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> @@ -390,6 +402,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
> __field( u32, flags )
> __field( bool, force_nonblock )
> __field( bool, sq_thread )
> +
> + __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> @@ -399,12 +413,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
> __entry->opcode = opcode;
> __entry->flags = flags;
> __entry->force_nonblock = force_nonblock;
> - __entry->sq_thread = sq_thread;
> +
> + __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
> ),
>
Looks like a spurious removal here of the sq_thread assignment? I will
fix it up.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk
2022-06-23 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-06-23 14:59 ` Dylan Yudaken
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Yudaken @ 2022-06-23 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 08:36 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/23/22 2:37 AM, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> > @@ -390,6 +402,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
> > __field( u32, flags )
> > __field( bool, force_nonblock )
> > __field( bool, sq_thread )
> > +
> > + __string( op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode) )
> > ),
> >
> > TP_fast_assign(
> > @@ -399,12 +413,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
> > __entry->opcode = opcode;
> > __entry->flags = flags;
> > __entry->force_nonblock = force_nonblock;
> > - __entry->sq_thread = sq_thread;
> > +
> > + __assign_str(op_str, io_uring_get_opcode(opcode));
> > ),
> >
>
> Looks like a spurious removal here of the sq_thread assignment? I
> will
> fix it up.
>
Ah damn. Good spot!
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk
2022-06-23 8:37 [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-23 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2022-06-25 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-06-25 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dylany, io-uring, asml.silence
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:37:43 -0700, Dylan Yudaken wrote:
> The TP_printk macro's are not supposed to use custom code ([1]) or else
> tools such as perf cannot use these events.
>
> Convert the opcode string representation to use the __string wiring that
> the event framework provides ([2]).
>
> [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/379903/
> [2]: https://lwn.net/Articles/381064/
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk
commit: e70b64a3f28b9f54602ae3e706b1dc1338de3df7
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-25 12:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-23 8:37 [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: move io_uring_get_opcode out of TP_printk Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-23 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-23 14:59 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-06-25 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox