From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 20/23] io_uring: reshuffle queue_sqe completion handling
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:31:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69ebb7881aee83866f87e75a806061d87e8ae299.1632500265.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
If a request completed inline the result should only be zero, it's a
grave error otherwise. So, when we see REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE it's not
even necessary to check the return code, and the flag check can be moved
earlier.
It's one "if" less for inline completions, and same two checks for it
normally completing (ret == 0). Those are two cases we care about the
most.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 76838d18493f..7c91e194a43b 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6917,14 +6917,13 @@ static inline void __io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req)
ret = io_issue_sqe(req, IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK|IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER);
+ if (req->flags & REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE)
+ return;
/*
* We async punt it if the file wasn't marked NOWAIT, or if the file
* doesn't support non-blocking read/write attempts
*/
if (likely(!ret)) {
- if (req->flags & REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE)
- return;
-
linked_timeout = io_prep_linked_timeout(req);
if (linked_timeout)
io_queue_linked_timeout(linked_timeout);
--
2.33.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-24 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-24 16:31 [RFC][PATCHSET 00/23] rework/optimise submission+completion paths Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] io_uring: mark having different creds unlikely Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] io_uring: force_nonspin Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] io_uring: make io_do_iopoll return number of reqs Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] io_uring: use slist for completion batching Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] io_uring: remove allocation cache array Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 06/23] io-wq: add io_wq_work_node based stack Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] io_uring: replace list with stack for req caches Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] io_uring: split iopoll loop Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] io_uring: use single linked list for iopoll Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] io_uring: add a helper for batch free Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 11/23] io_uring: convert iopoll_completed to store_release Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 12/23] io_uring: optimise batch completion Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] io_uring: inline completion batching helpers Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] io_uring: don't pass tail into io_free_batch_list Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] io_uring: don't pass state to io_submit_state_end Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] io_uring: deduplicate io_queue_sqe() call sites Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] io_uring: remove drain_active check from hot path Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] io_uring: split slow path from io_queue_sqe Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] io_uring: inline hot path of __io_queue_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:31 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-09-24 16:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] io_uring: restructure submit sqes to_submit checks Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:32 ` [PATCH 22/23] io_uring: kill off ->inflight_entry field Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-24 16:32 ` [PATCH 23/23] io_uring: comment why inline complete calls io_clean_op() Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69ebb7881aee83866f87e75a806061d87e8ae299.1632500265.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox