public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <[email protected]>
To: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>,
	Mat Martineau <[email protected]>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <[email protected]>,
	Xin Long <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	Jason Xing <[email protected]>,
	Joanne Koong <[email protected]>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <[email protected]>,
	Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>,
	Guillaume Nault <[email protected]>,
	Andrea Righi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd()
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:15:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 6/14/23 5:07 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
> index 8defc8f1d82e..58dea87077af 100644
> --- a/include/linux/net.h
> +++ b/include/linux/net.h
> @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ struct proto_ops {
>  	int	 	(*compat_ioctl) (struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>  				      unsigned long arg);
>  #endif
> +	int		(*uring_cmd)(struct socket *sock, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +				     unsigned int issue_flags);
>  	int		(*gettstamp) (struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
>  				      bool timeval, bool time32);
>  	int		(*listen)    (struct socket *sock, int len);
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 62a1b99da349..a49b8b19292b 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ typedef struct {
>  struct sock;
>  struct proto;
>  struct net;
> +struct io_uring_cmd;
>  
>  typedef __u32 __bitwise __portpair;
>  typedef __u64 __bitwise __addrpair;
> @@ -1259,6 +1260,9 @@ struct proto {
>  
>  	int			(*ioctl)(struct sock *sk, int cmd,
>  					 int *karg);
> +	int			(*uring_cmd)(struct sock *sk,
> +					     struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +					     unsigned int issue_flags);
>  	int			(*init)(struct sock *sk);
>  	void			(*destroy)(struct sock *sk);
>  	void			(*shutdown)(struct sock *sk, int how);
> @@ -1934,6 +1938,8 @@ int sock_common_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
>  			int flags);
>  int sock_common_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  			   sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
> +int sock_common_uring_cmd(struct socket *sock, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +			  unsigned int issue_flags);
>  
>  void sk_common_release(struct sock *sk);
>  
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 1df7e432fec5..339fa74db60f 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -3668,6 +3668,18 @@ int sock_common_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_common_setsockopt);
>  
> +int sock_common_uring_cmd(struct socket *sock, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> +			  unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> +
> +	if (!sk->sk_prot || !sk->sk_prot->uring_cmd)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return sk->sk_prot->uring_cmd(sk, cmd, issue_flags);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_common_uring_cmd);
> +


io_uring is just another in-kernel user of sockets. There is no reason
for io_uring references to be in core net code. It should be using
exposed in-kernel APIs and doing any translation of its op codes in
io_uring/  code.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-14 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-14 11:07 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] add initial io_uring_cmd support for sockets Breno Leitao
2023-06-14 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd() Breno Leitao
2023-06-14 15:15   ` David Ahern [this message]
2023-06-19  9:28     ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-06-19 14:06       ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-06-20  2:09       ` David Ahern
2023-06-19 11:20     ` Breno Leitao
2023-06-19 16:12       ` David Ahern
2023-06-23 10:17       ` Stefan Metzmacher
2023-06-23 15:20         ` David Ahern
2023-06-14 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to UDP Breno Leitao
2023-06-14 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to TCP Breno Leitao
2023-06-14 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to raw "protocol" Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox