Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] file: add callback for creating long-term dmabuf maps

[Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>]

On 4/30/26 07:03, Christian König wrote:
> On 4/29/26 17:25, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Introduce a new file callback that allows creating long-term dma
>> mapping. All necessary information together with a dmabuf will be passed
>> in the second argument of type struct io_dmabuf_token, which will be
>> defined in following patches.
> 
> Well first of all the naming is probably not the best. Maybe rather call that dma-buf attachment or context or mappping.

"Mapping" or "attachment" would be confusing as maps are created lazily
together with struct io_dmabuf_map. I can name it create_dmabuf_ctx(),
but I decided to use "token" not to collide with dmabuf terminology.
e.g. I wouldn't be surprised to see some dmabuf ctx in the dmabuf
implementation code. Maybe "*io_ctx" would be better.

> Then the patch should probably define the full interface and not just add the callback here and then the structure in a follow up patch.

I strongly prefer splitting patches so that they touch one tree at
a time whenever possible. tbh, I don't see much of a problem it being
not defined as it's just forwarded in first patches, but I can shuffle
it around in the series so that definitions come first.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov