public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao_Xu <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Loophole in async page I/O
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:13:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

在 2020/10/13 上午5:13, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
> This one's pretty unlikely, but there's a case in buffered reads where
> an IOCB_WAITQ read can end up sleeping.
> 
> generic_file_buffered_read():
>                  page = find_get_page(mapping, index);
> ...
>                  if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> ...
>                          if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ) {
> ...
>                                  error = wait_on_page_locked_async(page,
>                                                                  iocb->ki_waitq);
> wait_on_page_locked_async():
>          if (!PageLocked(page))
>                  return 0;
> (back to generic_file_buffered_read):
>                          if (!mapping->a_ops->is_partially_uptodate(page,
>                                                          offset, iter->count))
>                                  goto page_not_up_to_date_locked;
> 
> page_not_up_to_date_locked:
>                  if (iocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_NOIO | IOCB_NOWAIT)) {
>                          unlock_page(page);
>                          put_page(page);
>                          goto would_block;
>                  }
> ...
>                  error = mapping->a_ops->readpage(filp, page);
> (will unlock page on I/O completion)
>                  if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
>                          error = lock_page_killable(page);
> 
> So if we have IOCB_WAITQ set but IOCB_NOWAIT clear, we'll call ->readpage()
> and wait for the I/O to complete.  I can't quite figure out if this is
> intentional -- I think not; if I understand the semantics right, we
> should be returning -EIOCBQUEUED and punting to an I/O thread to
> kick off the I/O and wait.
> 
> I think the right fix is to return -EIOCBQUEUED from
> wait_on_page_locked_async() if the page isn't locked.  ie this:
> 
> @@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static int wait_on_page_locked_async(struct page *page,
>                                       struct wait_page_queue *wait)
>   {
>          if (!PageLocked(page))
> -               return 0;
> +               return -EIOCBQUEUED;
>          return __wait_on_page_locked_async(compound_head(page), wait, false);
>   }
>   
> But as I said, I'm not sure what the semantics are supposed to be.
> 
Hi Matthew,
which kernel version are you use, I believe I've fixed this case in the 
commit c8d317aa1887b40b188ec3aaa6e9e524333caed1
in this commit, I did the modification:

diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 1aaea26556cc..ea383478fc22 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2267,7 +2267,11 @@ ssize_t generic_file_buffered_read(struct kiocb 
*iocb,
                 }

                 if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
-                       error = lock_page_killable(page);
+                       if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)
+                               error = lock_page_async(page, 
iocb->ki_waitq);
+                       else
+                               error = lock_page_killable(page);
+
                         if (unlikely(error))
                                 goto readpage_error;
                         if (!PageUptodate(page)) {

lock_page_killable() won't be called in this case.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-13  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-12 21:13 Loophole in async page I/O Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-12 22:08 ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-12 22:22   ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-12 22:42     ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-14 20:31       ` Hao_Xu
2020-10-14 20:57         ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-15 11:27           ` Hao_Xu
2020-10-15 12:17             ` Hao_Xu
2020-10-13  5:31   ` Hao_Xu
2020-10-13 17:50     ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-13 19:50       ` Hao_Xu
2020-10-13  5:13 ` Hao_Xu [this message]
2020-10-13 12:01   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-13 19:57     ` Hao_Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e341fd1-bd2a-7774-5323-41f3a0531295@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox