From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix deferred req iovec leak
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:56:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/6/20 10:16 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 06/02/2020 20:04, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 06/02/2020 19:51, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> After defer, a request will be prepared, that includes allocating iovec
>>> if needed, and then submitted through io_wq_submit_work() but not custom
>>> handler (e.g. io_rw_async()/io_sendrecv_async()). However, it'll leak
>>> iovec, as it's in io-wq and the code goes as follows:
>>>
>>> io_read() {
>>> if (!io_wq_current_is_worker())
>>> kfree(iovec);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Put all deallocation logic in io_{read,write,send,recv}(), which will
>>> leave the memory, if going async with -EAGAIN.
>>>
>> Interestingly, this will fail badly if it returns -EAGAIN from io-wq context.
>> Apparently, I need to do v2.
>>
> Or not...
> Jens, can you please explain what's with the -EAGAIN handling in
> io_wq_submit_work()? Checking the code, it seems neither of
> read/write/recv/send can return -EAGAIN from async context (i.e.
> force_nonblock=false). Are there other ops that can do it?
Nobody should return -EAGAIN with force_nonblock=false, they should
end the io_kiocb inline for that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 16:51 [PATCH] io_uring: fix deferred req iovec leak Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-06 17:04 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-06 17:16 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-06 19:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-02-06 20:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-06 20:16 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-06 20:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-06 20:58 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-06 21:03 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-06 21:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox