public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: remove PF_EXITING checking in io_poll_rewait()
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 01:36:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

在 2021/8/20 上午1:29, Jens Axboe 写道:
> On 8/19/21 11:26 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> 在 2021/8/19 下午11:48, Jens Axboe 写道:
>>> We have two checks of task->flags & PF_EXITING left:
>>>
>>> 1) In io_req_task_submit(), which is called in task_work and hence always
>>>      in the context of the original task. That means that
>>>      req->task == current, and hence checking ->flags is totally fine.
>>>
>>> 2) In io_poll_rewait(), where we need to stop re-arming poll to prevent
>>>      it interfering with cancelation. Here, req->task is not necessarily
>>>      current, and hence the check is racy. Use the ctx refs state instead
>>>      to check if we need to cancel this request or not.
>> Hi Jens,
>> I saw cases that io_req_task_submit() and io_poll_rewait() in one
>> function, why one is safe and the other one not? btw, it seems both two
>> executes in task_work context..and task_work_add() may fail and then
>> work goes to system_wq, is that case safe?
I've got answer for the second question..
> 
> io_req_task_submit() is guaranteed to be run in the task that is req->task,
> io_poll_rewait() is not. The latter can get called from eg the poll
> waitqueue handling, which is not run from the task in question.
I only found io_poll_rewait() call in io_async_task_func() and
io_poll_task_func(), both are in task_work
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-19 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-19 15:48 [PATCH] io_uring: remove PF_EXITING checking in io_poll_rewait() Jens Axboe
2021-08-19 17:26 ` Hao Xu
2021-08-19 17:29   ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-19 17:36     ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-19 17:39       ` Hao Xu
2021-08-19 17:36     ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-08-19 17:37       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e8d52e3-1f44-d2fd-5377-aefdeb90b011@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox