From: Fabian Ebner <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: don't block level reissue off completion path
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:50:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Am 28.07.21 um 15:23 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 7/28/21 3:26 AM, Fabian Ebner wrote:
>> Am 27.07.21 um 18:58 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>>> Some setups, like SCSI, can throw spurious -EAGAIN off the softirq
>>> completion path. Normally we expect this to happen inline as part
>>> of submission, but apparently SCSI has a weird corner case where it
>>> can happen as part of normal completions.
>>>
>>> This should be solved by having the -EAGAIN bubble back up the stack
>>> as part of submission, but previous attempts at this failed and we're
>>> not just quite there yet. Instead we currently use REQ_F_REISSUE to
>>> handle this case.
>>>
>>> For now, catch it in io_rw_should_reissue() and prevent a reissue
>>> from a bogus path.
>>>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Reported-by: Fabian Ebner <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/io_uring.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> index 6ba101cd4661..83f67d33bf67 100644
>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> @@ -2447,6 +2447,12 @@ static bool io_rw_should_reissue(struct io_kiocb *req)
>>> */
>>> if (percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs))
>>> return false;
>>> + /*
>>> + * Play it safe and assume not safe to re-import and reissue if we're
>>> + * not in the original thread group (or in task context).
>>> + */
>>> + if (!same_thread_group(req->task, current) || !in_task())
>>> + return false;
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> #else
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you for the fix! This does indeed prevent the panic (with 5.11.22)
>> and hang (with 5.13.3) with my problematic workload.
>
> Perfect, thanks for re-testing! Can I add your Tested-by to the patch?
>
Sure, feel free to do so.
Best Regards,
Fabian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 16:58 [PATCH 0/2] Further async re-queue tightening/fix Jens Axboe
2021-07-27 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: always reissue from task_work context Jens Axboe
2021-07-27 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: don't block level reissue off completion path Jens Axboe
2021-07-28 9:26 ` Fabian Ebner
2021-07-28 13:23 ` Jens Axboe
2021-07-29 6:50 ` Fabian Ebner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox