From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Bui Quang Minh <[email protected]>,
lizetao <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: simplify the SQPOLL thread check when cancelling requests
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:15:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 1/12/25 16:14, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
...
>>> @@ -2898,7 +2899,12 @@ static __cold void io_ring_exit_work(struct
>>> work_struct *work)
>>> if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)
>>> io_move_task_work_from_local(ctx);
>>>
>>> - while (io_uring_try_cancel_requests(ctx, NULL, true))
>>> + /*
>>> + * Even if SQPOLL thread reaches this path, don't force
>>> + * iopoll here, let the io_uring_cancel_generic handle
>>> + * it.
>>
>> Just curious, will sq_thread enter this io_ring_exit_work path?
>
> AFAIK, yes. The SQPOLL thread is created with create_io_thread, this function creates a new task with CLONE_FILES. So all the open files is shared. There will be case that the parent closes its io_uring file and SQPOLL thread become the only owner of that file. So it can reach this path when terminating.
The function is run by a separate kthread, the sqpoll task doesn't
call it directly.
[...]
>>>> io_uring,
>>> - cancel_all);
>>> + cancel_all,
>>> + true);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (loop) {
>>> --
>>> 2.43.0
>>>
>>
>> Maybe you miss something, just like Begunkov mentioned in your last version patch:
>>
>> io_uring_cancel_generic
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(sqd && sqd->thread != current);
>>
>> This WARN_ON_ONCE will never be triggered, so you could remove it.
>
> He meant that we don't need to annotate sqd->thread access in this debug check. The io_uring_cancel_generic function has assumption that the sgd is not NULL only when it's called by a SQPOLL thread. So the check means to ensure this assumption. A data race happens only when this function is called by other tasks than the SQPOLL thread, so it can race with the SQPOLL termination. However, the sgd is not NULL only when this function is called by SQPOLL thread. In normal situation following the io_uring_cancel_generic's assumption, the data race cannot happen. And in case the assumption is broken, the warning almost always is triggered even if data race happens. So we can ignore the race here.
Right. And that's the point of warnings, they're supposed to be
untriggerable, otherwise there is a problem with the code that
needs to be fixed.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-12 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-12 14:33 [PATCH] io_uring: simplify the SQPOLL thread check when cancelling requests Bui Quang Minh
2025-01-12 15:45 ` lizetao
2025-01-12 16:14 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-01-12 21:15 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-01-13 4:40 ` lizetao
2025-01-13 15:33 ` Bui Quang Minh
2025-01-13 7:49 ` lizetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox