From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to UDP
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:54:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 4/6/23 15:43, Breno Leitao wrote:
> This is the implementation of uring_cmd for the udp protocol. It
> basically encompasses SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ and
> SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ, which is similar to the SIOCOUTQ and SIOCINQ
> ioctls.
>
> The return value is exactly the same as the regular ioctl (udp_ioctl()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/net/udp.h | 2 ++
> include/uapi/linux/net.h | 5 +++++
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index de4b528522bb..c0e829dacc2f 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ void udp_flush_pending_frames(struct sock *sk);
> int udp_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, u16 *gso_size);
> void udp4_hwcsum(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 src, __be32 dst);
> int udp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +int udp_uring_cmd(struct sock *sk, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> + unsigned int issue_flags);
> int udp_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, unsigned long arg);
> int udp_init_sock(struct sock *sk);
> int udp_pre_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/net.h b/include/uapi/linux/net.h
> index 4dabec6bd957..dd8e7ced7d24 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/net.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/net.h
> @@ -55,4 +55,9 @@ typedef enum {
>
> #define __SO_ACCEPTCON (1 << 16) /* performed a listen */
>
> +enum {
> + SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ = 0,
> + SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ,
> +};
> +
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_NET_H */
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index c605d171eb2d..d6d60600831b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@
> #include <net/sock_reuseport.h>
> #include <net/addrconf.h>
> #include <net/udp_tunnel.h>
> +#include <linux/io_uring.h>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> #include <net/ipv6_stubs.h>
> #endif
> @@ -1711,6 +1712,20 @@ static int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk)
> return res;
> }
>
> +int udp_uring_cmd(struct sock *sk, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> + unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + switch (cmd->sqe->cmd_op) {
Not particularly a problem of this series, but what bothers
me is the quite unfortunate placement of cmd_op in SQE.
struct io_uring_sqe {
...
union {
__u64 d1;
struct {
__u32 cmd_op;
__u32 __pad1;
};
};
__u64 d2;
__u32 d3;
...
};
I'd much prefer it like this:
struct io_uring_sqe {
...
__u64 d1[2];
__u32 cmd_op;
...
};
We can't change it for NVMe, but at least new commands can have
a better layout. It's read in the generic cmd path, i.e.
io_uring_cmd_prep(), so will need some refactoring to make
the placement cmd specific.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-11 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 14:43 [PATCH 0/5] add initial io_uring_cmd support for sockets Breno Leitao
2023-04-06 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd() Breno Leitao
2023-04-06 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to UDP Breno Leitao
2023-04-11 12:54 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-04-06 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to TCP Breno Leitao
2023-04-06 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] net: add uring_cmd callback to raw "protocol" Breno Leitao
2023-04-06 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] add initial io_uring_cmd support for sockets Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-06 15:59 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-06 18:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-07 2:46 ` David Ahern
2023-04-11 12:00 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-11 14:36 ` David Ahern
2023-04-11 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-11 14:51 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-11 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-11 15:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-11 15:06 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-11 15:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-11 15:28 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-12 13:53 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-12 14:28 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-13 0:02 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-13 14:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-13 14:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-13 14:57 ` David Laight
2023-04-18 13:23 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-18 19:41 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-20 14:43 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-20 16:48 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-04-11 15:10 ` David Ahern
2023-04-11 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-11 15:27 ` David Ahern
2023-04-11 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-12 7:39 ` David Laight
2023-04-06 16:41 ` Keith Busch
2023-04-06 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-06 16:58 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-06 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC] io_uring: Pass whole sqe to commands Breno Leitao
2023-04-07 18:51 ` Keith Busch
2023-04-11 12:22 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-11 12:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-13 2:56 ` Ming Lei
2023-04-13 16:47 ` Breno Leitao
2023-04-14 2:12 ` Ming Lei
2023-04-14 13:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-14 13:59 ` Ming Lei
2023-04-14 14:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-16 9:51 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox