public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix provide_buffers sign extension
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 19/03/2021 10:31, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 19/03/2021 10:21, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> io_provide_buffers_prep()'s "p->len * p->nbufs" to sign extension
>> problems. Not a huge problem as it's only used for access_ok() and
>> increases the checked length, but better to keep typing right.
>>
>> Reported-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>> Fixes: efe68c1ca8f49 ("io_uring: validate the full range of provided buffers for access")
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  fs/io_uring.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index c2489b463eb9..4f1c98502a09 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -3978,6 +3978,7 @@ static int io_remove_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>>  static int io_provide_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
>>  				   const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>  {
>> +	unsigned long size;
>>  	struct io_provide_buf *p = &req->pbuf;
>>  	u64 tmp;
>>  
>> @@ -3991,7 +3992,8 @@ static int io_provide_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
>>  	p->addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
>>  	p->len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
>>  
>> -	if (!access_ok(u64_to_user_ptr(p->addr), (p->len * p->nbufs)))
>> +	size = (unsigned long)p->len * p->nbufs;
>> +	if (!access_ok(u64_to_user_ptr(p->addr), size))
>>  		return -EFAULT;
>>  
>>  	p->bgid = READ_ONCE(sqe->buf_group);
>>
> 
> Does it make sense to make size a u64 and cast to a u64 rather than
> unsigned long?

static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
{
	return 1;
}

Not sure. I was thinking about size_t, but ended up sticking
to access_ok types.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-19 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19 10:21 [PATCH] io_uring: fix provide_buffers sign extension Pavel Begunkov
2021-03-19 10:31 ` Colin Ian King
2021-03-19 10:34   ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-03-19 10:39     ` Colin Ian King
2021-03-22  1:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-03-22 13:41 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox