From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>,
Bijan Mottahedeh <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] io_uring: mark REQ_NOWAIT for a non-mq queue as unspported
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 13:22:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/28/20 1:01 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/28/20 12:35 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Bijan Mottahedeh <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> Mark a REQ_NOWAIT request for a non-mq queue as unspported instead of
>>> retryable since otherwise the io_uring layer will keep resubmitting
>>> the request.
>>
>> Getting back to this...
>>
>> Jens, right now (using your io_uring-5.7 or linus' tree) fio's
>> t/io_uring will never get io completions when run against a file on a
>> file system that is backed by lvm. The system will have one workqueue
>> per sqe submitted, all spinning, eating up CPU time.
>>
>> # ./t/io_uring /mnt/test/poo
>> Added file /mnt/test/poo
>> sq_ring ptr = 0x0x7fbed40ae000
>> sqes ptr = 0x0x7fbed40ac000
>> cq_ring ptr = 0x0x7fbed40aa000
>> polled=1, fixedbufs=1, buffered=0 QD=128, sq_ring=128, cq_ring=256
>> submitter=3851
>> IOPS=128, IOS/call=6/0, inflight=128 (128)
>> IOPS=0, IOS/call=0/0, inflight=128 (128)
>> IOPS=0, IOS/call=0/0, inflight=128 (128)
>> IOPS=0, IOS/call=0/0, inflight=128 (128)
>> IOPS=0, IOS/call=0/0, inflight=128 (128)
>> IOPS=0, IOS/call=0/0, inflight=128 (128)
>> ...
>>
>> # ps auxw | grep io_wqe
>> root 3849 80.1 0.0 0 0 ? R 14:32 0:40 [io_wqe_worker-0]
>> root 3850 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:32 0:00 [io_wqe_worker-0]
>> root 3853 72.8 0.0 0 0 ? R 14:32 0:36 [io_wqe_worker-0]
>> root 3854 81.4 0.0 0 0 ? R 14:32 0:40 [io_wqe_worker-1]
>> root 3855 74.8 0.0 0 0 ? R 14:32 0:37 [io_wqe_worker-0]
>> root 3856 74.8 0.0 0 0 ? R 14:32 0:37 [io_wqe_worker-1]
>> ...
>>
>> # ps auxw | grep io_wqe | grep -v grep | wc -l
>> 129
>>
>> With this patch applied, the test program will exit without doing I/O
>> (which I don't think is the right behavior either, right?):
>>
>> # t/io_uring /mnt/test/poo
>> Added file /mnt/test/poo
>> sq_ring ptr = 0x0x7fdb98f00000
>> sqes ptr = 0x0x7fdb98efe000
>> cq_ring ptr = 0x0x7fdb98efc000
>> polled=1, fixedbufs=1, buffered=0 QD=128, sq_ring=128, cq_ring=256
>> submitter=33233
>> io: unexpected ret=-95
>> Your filesystem/driver/kernel doesn't support polled IO
>> IOPS=128, IOS/call=32/0, inflight=128 (127)
>>
>> /mnt/test is an xfs file system on top of a linear LVM volume on an nvme
>> device (with 8 poll queues configured).
>
> poll won't work over dm, so that looks correct. What happens if you edit
> it and disable poll? Would be curious to see both buffered = 0 and
> buffered = 1 runs with that.
>
> I'll try this here too.
I checked, and with the offending commit reverted, it behaves exactly
like it should - io_uring doesn't hit endless retries, and we still
return -EAGAIN to userspace for preadv2(..., RFW_NOWAIT) if not supported.
I've queued up the revert.
Jeff, the poll test above is supposed to fail as we can't poll on dm.
So that part is expected.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 21:52 [RFC 0/2] io_uring: don't use kiocb.private to store buf_index Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-19 21:52 ` [RFC 1/2] " Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-19 22:07 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-19 22:20 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-19 22:48 ` Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-19 21:52 ` [RFC 2/2] io_uring: mark REQ_NOWAIT for a non-mq queue as unspported Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-28 18:35 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-05-28 19:01 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-28 19:22 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-05-28 19:31 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-05-28 22:12 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-05-28 23:03 ` Jens Axboe
2020-05-29 15:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-05-29 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox