From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: fix failed linkchain code logic
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:12:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 8/23/21 12:02 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 8/23/21 4:25 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> Given a linkchain like this:
>> req0(link_flag)-->req1(link_flag)-->...-->reqn(no link_flag)
>>
>> There is a problem:
>> - if some intermediate linked req like req1 's submittion fails, reqs
>> after it won't be cancelled.
>>
>> - sqpoll disabled: maybe it's ok since users can get the error info
>> of req1 and stop submitting the following sqes.
>>
>> - sqpoll enabled: definitely a problem, the following sqes will be
>> submitted in the next round.
>>
>> The solution is to refactor the code logic to:
>> - if a linked req's submittion fails, just mark it and the head(if it
>> exists) as REQ_F_FAIL. Leverage req->result to indicate whether it
>> is failed or cancelled.
>> - submit or fail the whole chain when we come to the end of it.
>
> This looks good to me, a couple of comments below.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 44b1b2b58e6a..9ae8f2a5c584 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -1776,8 +1776,6 @@ static void io_preinit_req(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> req->ctx = ctx;
>> req->link = NULL;
>> req->async_data = NULL;
>> - /* not necessary, but safer to zero */
>> - req->result = 0;
>
> Please leave it. I'm afraid of leaking stack to userspace because
^^^^^
Don't know why I called it "stack", just kernel memory/data
> ->result juggling looks prone to errors. And preinit is pretty cold
> anyway.
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 3:25 [PATCH for-5.15 v2 0/2] fix failed linkchain code logic Hao Xu
2021-08-23 3:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: remove redundant req_set_fail() Hao Xu
2021-08-23 3:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: fix failed linkchain code logic Hao Xu
2021-08-23 11:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-08-23 17:12 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-08-23 18:45 ` Hao Xu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-27 9:46 [PATCH for-5.15 v3 0/2] " Hao Xu
2021-08-27 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: " Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox