From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Palash Oswal <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], LKML <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 22:31:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/13/21 10:28 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/10/21 5:47 AM, Palash Oswal wrote:
>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 4:15 PM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/3/21 5:41 AM, Palash Oswal wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 3:42 AM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> The test might be very useful. Would you send a patch to
>>>>> liburing? Or mind the repro being taken as a test?
>>>>
>>>> Pavel,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on a PR for liburing with this test. Do you know how I can
>>>
>>> Perfect, thanks
>>>
>>>> address this behavior?
>>>
>>> As the hang is sqpoll cancellations, it's most probably
>>> fixed in 5.13 + again awaits to be taken for stable.
>>>
>>> Don't know about segfaults, but it was so for long, and
>>> syz reproducers are ofthen faults for me, and exit with 0
>>> in the end. So, I wouldn't worry about it.
>>>
>>>
>> Hey Pavel,
>> The bug actually fails to reproduce on 5.12 when the fork() call is made by
>> the runtests.sh script. This causes the program to end correctly, and the
>> hang does not occur. I verified this on 5.12 where the bug isn't patched.
>> Just running the `sqpoll-cancel-hang` triggers the bug; whereas running it
>> after being forked from runtests.sh does not trigger the bug.
>
> I see. fyi, it's always good to wait for 5 minutes, because some useful
> logs are not generated immediately but do timeout based hang detection.
>
> I'd think that may be due CLONE_IO and how to whom it binds workers,
> but can you try first:
>
> 1) timeout -s INT -k $TIMEOUT $TIMEOUT ./sqpoll-cancel-hang
edit:
timeout -s INT -k 60 60 ./sqpoll-cancel-hang
And privileged, root/sudo
>
> 2) remove timeout from <liburing>/tests/Makefile and run
> "./runtests.sh sqpoll-cancel-hang" again looking for faults?
>
> diff --git a/test/runtests.sh b/test/runtests.sh
> index e8f4ae5..2b51dca 100755
> --- a/test/runtests.sh
> +++ b/test/runtests.sh
> @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ run_test()
> fi
>
> # Run the test
> - timeout -s INT -k $TIMEOUT $TIMEOUT ./$test_name $dev
> + # timeout -s INT -k $TIMEOUT $TIMEOUT ./$test_name $dev
> + ./$test_name $dev
> local status=$?
>
> # Check test status
>
>
>>
>> The segfaults are benign, but notice the "All tests passed" in the previous
>> mail. It should not have passed, as the run was on 5.12. Therefore I wanted
>> to ask your input on how to address this odd behaviour, where the
>> involvement of runtests.sh actually mitigated the bug.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> root@syzkaller:~/liburing/test# ./runtests.sh sqpoll-cancel-hang
>>>> Running test sqp[ 15.310997] Running test sqpoll-cancel-hang:
>>>> oll-cancel-hang:
>>>> [ 15.333348] sqpoll-cancel-h[305]: segfault at 0 ip 000055ad00e265e3
>>> sp]
>>>> [ 15.334940] Code: 89 d8 8d 34 90 8b 45 04 ba 03 00 00 00 c1 e0 04 03
>>> 46
>>>> All tests passed
>>>>
>>>> root@syzkaller:~/liburing/test# ./sqpoll-cancel-hang
>>>> [ 13.572639] sqpoll-cancel-h[298]: segfault at 0 ip 00005634c4a455e3
>>> sp]
>>>> [ 13.576506] Code: 89 d8 8d 34 90 8b 45 04 ba 03 00 00 00 c1 e0 04 03
>>> 46
>>>> [ 23.350459] random: crng init done
>>>> [ 23.352837] random: 7 urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting
>>>> [ 243.090865] INFO: task iou-sqp-298:299 blocked for more than 120
>>> secon.
>>>> [ 243.095187] Not tainted 5.12.0 #142
>>>> [ 243.099800] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
>>> disable.
>>>> [ 243.105928] task:iou-sqp-298 state:D stack: 0 pid: 299 ppid:
>>> 4
>>>> [ 243.111044] Call Trace:
>>>> [ 243.112855] __schedule+0xb1d/0x1130
>>>> [ 243.115549] ? __sched_text_start+0x8/0x8
>>>> [ 243.118328] ? io_wq_worker_sleeping+0x145/0x500
>>>> [ 243.121790] schedule+0x131/0x1c0
>>>> [ 243.123698] io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0x288/0x350
>>>> [ 243.125977] ? io_sq_thread_unpark+0xd0/0xd0
>>>> [ 243.128966] ? mutex_lock+0xbb/0x130
>>>> [ 243.132572] ? init_wait_entry+0xe0/0xe0
>>>> [ 243.135429] ? wait_for_completion_killable_timeout+0x20/0x20
>>>> [ 243.138303] io_sq_thread+0x174c/0x18c0
>>>> [ 243.140162] ? io_rsrc_put_work+0x380/0x380
>>>> [ 243.141613] ? init_wait_entry+0xe0/0xe0
>>>> [ 243.143686] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa5/0x180
>>>> [ 243.145619] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x190/0x190
>>>> [ 243.147671] ? calculate_sigpending+0x6b/0xa0
>>>> [ 243.149036] ? io_rsrc_put_work+0x380/0x380
>>>> [ 243.150694] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>>>>
>>>> Palash
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pavel Begunkov
>>>
>>
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[email protected]>
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2021-04-30 14:21 ` INFO: task hung in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll Palash Oswal
2021-04-30 14:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-30 15:02 ` Palash Oswal
2021-04-30 15:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-30 15:11 ` Palash Oswal
2021-04-30 18:34 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-30 18:34 ` syzbot
2021-04-30 21:04 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-01 4:51 ` Palash Oswal
2021-05-01 7:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-02 10:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-02 15:01 ` Palash Oswal
2021-05-02 15:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-02 22:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-03 4:41 ` Palash Oswal
2021-05-03 10:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
[not found] ` <CAGyP=7eoSfh7z638PnP5UF4xVKcrG1jB_qmFo6uPZ7iWfu_2sQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-05-13 21:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-13 21:31 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-05-15 7:44 ` Palash Oswal
2021-06-12 15:48 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox