From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AC9C001B0 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231363AbjFWLYp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:24:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58562 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231330AbjFWLYm (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:24:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC88E1739 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-988689a5f44so44976966b.1 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 04:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687519480; x=1690111480; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=U8IzdFjveQ9hwmkRa48Ek1vMmW1XJWaCIZgZ0bHO5ik=; b=mx4U/yiUy6F4aZVnwnZVRTyHCR7UqNc0GwOEmKT/1cXhyZFNraMikAjl8gpLCoO1Ql I/amnD0LzDmQpO9Oh9Dz6Rck0gbgA5yb4RFeyObt8ciFnT/ZNBso6DRJt+sPSsWjSPvj 5PmqT9m5T6OIF38GiRCfsL1Ud4zjlwc0hgybX3i1oKR68Xk75F5KHpFKeGtOOnvVRypm 58qeUDyFfvu3TLheO3bXNoYo0DubqOVfBVy/xLpbBaIb3CPOHPxLCZARIW1Nn7MmrJgj QF2/vb3iqnsbwIdfxzbbq/oQTwAXwVQTQ1hC1589AUWpC36h1Ssmyq5QINNoLemqL3mb Fx4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687519480; x=1690111480; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=U8IzdFjveQ9hwmkRa48Ek1vMmW1XJWaCIZgZ0bHO5ik=; b=bCZtArToCEX8aQ1czOFE69IuDVDT+FeG3jl8mAaBhfXezE5Sj4VUqB/h95Rq9YRlZ1 sPMCDqXaMCYA6sJ58orzGH1AAHjAvfqFi4OaWVHsaeomdBKvIizvGtskiku97BBbJHiz i3brkz/BpmuF6XsSynJ2xa0G8vwpXAnGjy2SsPdXY3juBYYTYLvItqe0S3/xJT6Hvb43 0XYjfw+6drIYUTISM35tIHcj35nuLMG+Ji5FGvSRrCPjl5chRITyUuQ8tpB9FgADO8hz cyiGha02tg6on5aT1/IxQFC/BscrkCCofCknqDg6mXsSlpgOihbH2qXyeCIcqEN6nzxv bZWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwAa3TAunrY0ZPq1xmmVVUEeEkIwxnXpt9TAWWNHmRCL5H2Aesz vZqK3uVCS/nkJYravQev9zxLdEks2aI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4/uktIQEljZ46am/ae4mVKpKSl9L5/v6kSTX5kCcd0ELLeW3SE2bvxrvvTaKUZQE65+HOIMA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f99:b0:973:e349:43c9 with SMTP id hr25-20020a1709073f9900b00973e34943c9mr19203901ejc.77.1687519480072; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 04:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 127.com ([2620:10d:c092:600::2:7d95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10-20020a1709067cca00b00969f44bbef3sm5959769ejp.11.2023.06.23.04.24.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 04:24:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Begunkov To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jens Axboe , asml.silence@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH 07/11] io_uring: kill io_cq_unlock() Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:23:27 +0100 Message-Id: <7dabb36856db2b562e78780480396c52c29b2bf4.1687518903.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org We're abusing ->completion_lock helpers. io_cq_unlock() neither locking conditionally nor doing CQE flushing, which means that callers must have some side reason of taking the lock and should do it directly. Open code io_cq_unlock() into io_cqring_overflow_kill() and clean it up. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov --- io_uring/io_uring.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 776d1aa73d26..2f55abb676c0 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -644,12 +644,6 @@ static inline void io_cq_lock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); } -static inline void io_cq_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) - __releases(ctx->completion_lock) -{ - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); -} - /* keep it inlined for io_submit_flush_completions() */ static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) __releases(ctx->completion_lock) @@ -694,10 +688,10 @@ static void io_cqring_overflow_kill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe; LIST_HEAD(list); - io_cq_lock(ctx); + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); list_splice_init(&ctx->cq_overflow_list, &list); clear_bit(IO_CHECK_CQ_OVERFLOW_BIT, &ctx->check_cq); - io_cq_unlock(ctx); + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); while (!list_empty(&list)) { ocqe = list_first_entry(&list, struct io_overflow_cqe, list); -- 2.40.0