From: Jiufei Xue <[email protected]>
To: "Carter Li 李通洲" <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:17:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2020/8/5 上午11:28, Carter Li 李通洲 wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/include/liburing.h b/src/include/liburing.h
>> index 0505a4f..82c2980 100644
>> --- a/src/include/liburing.h
>> +++ b/src/include/liburing.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ struct io_uring {
>> struct io_uring_sq sq;
>> struct io_uring_cq cq;
>> unsigned flags;
>> + unsigned flags_internal;
>> + unsigned features;
>> + unsigned pad[4];
>> int ring_fd;
>> };
>
> Won't it break existing code runs on newer kernel?
io_uring is a structure that used in userspace. It breaks the API
with existing compiled application. So I have changed the soname
to 2.0.7.
And for syscall io_uring_enter(), I have added a new feature bit
IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT and io_uring_enter() flag
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT. Here are 3 cases below:
1) old liburing <-> new kernel: old liburing can not pass the flag
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT, so new kernel will parse the arguments
the original way.
2) new liburing <-> old kernel: feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
not supported, liburing will do things like before.
3) new liburing <-> new kernel: feature IORING_FEAT_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT
supported, liburing pass the new arguments with the flag
IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS_TIMEOUT which helps kernel parse the arguments
correctly.
Thanks,
Jiufei.
> Won't it break code compiled with new liburing but runs on older kernel?
>
> IMO In this case, a new syscall `io_uring_setup2` is required at least.
>
> Regards,
> Carter
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-05 3:28 [PATCH liburing v3 0/2] add support for new timeout feature Carter Li 李通洲
2020-08-05 5:17 ` Jiufei Xue [this message]
2020-08-05 6:18 ` Carter Li 李通洲
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-05 3:04 Jiufei Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7efabc7f-a649-b0aa-ff3b-7cd6c9f450b7@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox