public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] io_uring: introduce non-circular SQ
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:55:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80368e4b-9148-40d0-bd52-1507fef68055@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a4y6esjj.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>

On 1/21/26 18:20, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Outside of SQPOLL, normally SQ entries are consumed by the time the
>> submission syscall returns. For those cases we don't need a circular
>> buffer and the head/tail tracking, instead the kernel can assume that
>> entries always start from the beginning of the SQ at index 0. This patch
>> introduces a setup flag doing exactly that. It's a simpler and helps
>> to keeps SQEs hot in cache.
>>
>> The feature is optional and enabled by setting IORING_SETUP_SQ_REWIND.
>> The flag is rejected if passed together with SQPOLL as it'd require
>> waiting for SQ before each submission. It also requires
>> IORING_SETUP_NO_SQARRAY, which can be supported but it's unlikely there
>> will be users, so leave more space for future optimisations.
> 
> This patch got me wondering if it would make sense to have a way to
> point to different buffers as the SQE map and execute them.  This way
> the user could initialize a set of operations in a specific region of
> the sq ring (or a separate buffer) once and have them repeatedly
> executed with a single command, similar to a procedure call.
> 
> Say we have a preloaded ring with some sqes to accept a new connection,
> and immediately some fixed data, etc.  When I want to run it, I push a
> SQE OP_EXECUTE pointing to this buffer to the "main" ring and io_uring
> will queue everything in this pre-registered buffer.
> 
> I imagine it would save nothing beyond SQ initialization. just curious
> if you see a use case for something like this?

You already can do it with the sq array. Never heard of anyone
using it, but liburing never exposed it to users either.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-21 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-20 20:47 [PATCH v3 1/1] io_uring: introduce non-circular SQ Pavel Begunkov
2026-01-21 14:59 ` Jens Axboe
2026-01-21 18:20 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-01-21 21:55   ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-01-22 16:18     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-01-22 22:59 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80368e4b-9148-40d0-bd52-1507fef68055@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox