public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [RFC] io_uring: wake up optimisations
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:58:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81104db1a04efbfcec90f5819081b4299542671a.1671559005.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)

NOT FOR INCLUSION, needs some ring poll workarounds

Flush completions is done either from the submit syscall or by the
task_work, both are in the context of the submitter task, and when it
goes for a single threaded rings like implied by ->task_complete, there
won't be any waiters on ->cq_wait but the master task. That means that
there can be no tasks sleeping on cq_wait while we run
__io_submit_flush_completions() and so waking up can be skipped.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 16a323a9ff70..a57b9008807c 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -618,6 +618,25 @@ static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	io_cqring_wake(ctx);
 }
 
+static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+	__releases(ctx->completion_lock)
+{
+	io_commit_cqring(ctx);
+	__io_cq_unlock(ctx);
+	io_commit_cqring_flush(ctx);
+
+	/*
+	 * As ->task_complete implies that the ring is single tasked, cq_wait
+	 * may only be waited on by the current in io_cqring_wait(), but since
+	 * it will re-check the wakeup conditions once we return we can safely
+	 * skip waking it up.
+	 */
+	if (!ctx->task_complete) {
+		smp_mb();
+		__io_cqring_wake(ctx);
+	}
+}
+
 void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	__releases(ctx->completion_lock)
 {
@@ -1458,7 +1477,7 @@ static void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	__io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
+	__io_cq_unlock_post_flush(ctx);
 
 	if (!wq_list_empty(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs)) {
 		io_free_batch_list(ctx, state->compl_reqs.first);
-- 
2.38.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-20 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20 17:58 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-12-20 18:06 ` [RFC] io_uring: wake up optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-20 18:10   ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-20 19:12     ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-12-20 19:22       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81104db1a04efbfcec90f5819081b4299542671a.1671559005.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox