From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
To: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai>
Cc: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] rust: io_uring: introduce rust abstraction for io-uring cmd
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 11:27:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81C84BD8-D99C-4103-A280-CFC71DF58E3B@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJijj4kiMV9yxOrM@sidongui-MacBookPro.local>
> On 10 Aug 2025, at 10:50, Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> On Sat Aug 9, 2025 at 2:51 PM CEST, Sidong Yang wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 12:18:49PM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>>>> We'd need to ensure that `borrow_pdu` can only be called if `store_pdu`
>>>> has been called before. Is there any way we can just ensure that pdu is
>>>> always initialized? Like a callback that's called once, before the value
>>>> is used at all?
>>>
>>> I've thought about this. As Celab said, returning `&mut MaybeUninit<[u8;32]> is
>>> simple and best. Only driver knows it's initialized. There is no way to
>>> check whether it's initialized with reading the pdu. The best way is to return
>>> `&mut MaybeUninit<[u8;32]>` and driver initializes it in first time. After
>>> init, driver knows it's guranteed that it's initialized so it could call
>>> `assume_init_mut()`. And casting to other struct is another problem. The driver
>>> is responsible for determining how to interpret the PDU, whether by using it
>>> directly as a byte array or by performing an unsafe cast to another struct.
>>
>> But then drivers will have to use `unsafe` & possibly cast the slice to
>> a struct? I think that's bad design since we try to avoid unsafe code in
>> drivers as much as possible. Couldn't we try to ensure from the
>> abstraction side that any time you create such an object, the driver
>> needs to provide the pdu data? Or we could make it implement `Default`
>> and then set it to that before handing it to the driver.
>
> pdu data is [u8; 32] memory space that driver can borrow. this has two kind of
> issues. The one is that the array is not initialized and another one is it's
> array type that driver should cast it to private data structure unsafely.
> The first one could be resolved with returning `&mut MaybeUninit<>`. And the
> second one, casting issue, is remaining.
>
> It seems that we need new unsafe trait like below:
>
> /// Pdu should be... repr C or transparent, sizeof <= 20
> unsafe trait Pdu: Sized {}
>
> /// Returning to casted Pdu type T
> pub fn pdu<T: Pdu>(&mut self) -> &mut MaybeUninit<T>
Wait, you receive an uninitialized array, and you’re supposed to cast it to
T, is that correct? Because that does not fit the signature above.
>
> I think it is like bytemuck::Pod trait. Pod meaning plain old data.
>
> Thanks,
> Sidong
>
>
>>
>> ---
>> Cheers,
>> Benno
I'm not really sure how this solves the transmute/cast problem. Is the trait
you're referring to supposed to have any member functions? Or is it just a
marker trait?
I wonder if we can fit the existing "kernel::FromBytes" for this problem.
— Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-10 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-27 15:03 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] rust: miscdevice: abstraction for uring-cmd Sidong Yang
2025-07-27 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] rust: bindings: add io_uring headers in bindings_helper.h Sidong Yang
2025-07-27 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] rust: io_uring: introduce rust abstraction for io-uring cmd Sidong Yang
2025-08-01 13:48 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-02 10:52 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-06 12:38 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-06 13:38 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-08 6:56 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-08 8:49 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-08 9:43 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-09 10:18 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-09 12:51 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-09 20:22 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-10 13:50 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-10 14:27 ` Daniel Almeida [this message]
2025-08-10 14:46 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-10 20:06 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-11 12:34 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-11 12:44 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-11 14:50 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-12 8:34 ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-12 12:19 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-12 12:43 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-12 13:56 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-12 13:59 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-12 14:38 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-13 0:54 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-08 13:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-08-09 12:53 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-05 3:39 ` Sidong Yang
2025-08-05 13:02 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-06 9:11 ` Sidong Yang
2025-07-27 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] rust: miscdevice: add uring_cmd() for MiscDevice trait Sidong Yang
2025-08-01 14:04 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-07 7:46 ` Sidong Yang
2025-07-27 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] samples: rust: rust_misc_device: add uring_cmd example Sidong Yang
2025-08-01 14:11 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-07 6:30 ` Sidong Yang
2025-07-27 17:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] rust: miscdevice: abstraction for uring-cmd Daniel Almeida
2025-08-01 14:13 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-07 6:17 ` Sidong Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81C84BD8-D99C-4103-A280-CFC71DF58E3B@collabora.com \
--to=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox