From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C7DC56202 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87B42074F for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="cKl8Nr/t" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731745AbgKIOm7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:42:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731612AbgKIOm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 09:42:57 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x144.google.com (mail-il1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363E3C0613CF for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 06:42:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x144.google.com with SMTP id z2so8468666ilh.11 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 06:42:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3ehw22GU6NrQDTL+oBdXxN0niE79/e+SUzQT5o4Dv28=; b=cKl8Nr/tQCjQOdgkH+HMJNGtQcsvOe4Xnz7aYKxhQUfYu8wNM9uaiNsMz5xwFQ01Ti 80gwmyhich63MM+Nu5KTebj41tkdUX7Qxth/QcLKTCJyTL8gUTsS6jwDIWkFwx2TLJLl BJvx8A0WKTRJA5voxYIBLFgy0AG9QG/87IBrcRX/ba7JmTjq+eKY0jyj2aX08CvaqDm/ HK74I/cmeCjPKUsLNdb0oAwT4pW9/xMEqTTRJY4KZ9V+5DtJFgr+BWsN2MnQUyA8lDF4 blZwZ8xD7iLoVidAC1uB4Zb2POC+N/vyt7Vf3Q6ay96EBMbAJR5iK8AjnMz3j0BI+meQ fApg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3ehw22GU6NrQDTL+oBdXxN0niE79/e+SUzQT5o4Dv28=; b=GFkO+RYJF5/kJOyQ4jdfPLSNNJ+jtC0hckW1mRKuPHLOJEq/qknGrfPot4ql0eBLe8 SaC/LpJd3ZcypZMHQH7O2qeQe3ZNNnRgCY90POnQq2JVcwlpWgdikjQwyNbSTuGNIMbP V/5RPS1NhUK5ktmBw4YeSKB1ooIWjm/Tnz4A/dRqVu4k6BjwFfzgdF7OJz0NZHccS4ji T29UPxRCot4tbgdQy5VBtkGYcGz83jNYrF8QS8PxoqVSd+/b7f5ytZl8k/ieT1yiNGMj c5MotbVXVnVE3b0E6oFbVEfXxA+CazClUL0+tWiDPuEp5MQpVx/Bbhju01+6Zut4Yc8C cFVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533k5KRB9Z1GrZYutkxWmG77+xbhKnhkB27ZOGNX1QmHjaFRxRAO bLzXusT+wxYlEI6bj9u2DofRaUlMMdi/Sg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrS0rM1ly4S3opodhlMfOgyobXuLtuNIDTHmrQcyzFG5xaOYxWwftU/rArBUInFkffwu7uQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a92:db05:: with SMTP id b5mr10068160iln.279.1604932976587; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 06:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 192sm7546998ilc.31.2020.11.09.06.42.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 06:42:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] improve SQPOLL handling To: Xiaoguang Wang , io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com References: <20201103061600.11053-1-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <71e21e18-69f6-fe24-2a13-1b8269d72393@linux.alibaba.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <82e42f8a-7f97-4016-ba55-1f460defef26@kernel.dk> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 07:42:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <71e21e18-69f6-fe24-2a13-1b8269d72393@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 11/8/20 7:16 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote: > hi, > > A gentle reminder. How does this patch set look now? > I think the first patch looks ok at least. I have applied 1/2 for now, I agree that one looks fine and should get applied. I'll go over 2/2 soonish. -- Jens Axboe