From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Usama Arif <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:49:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/3/22 11:24 AM, Usama Arif wrote:
> -static inline bool io_should_trigger_evfd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +static void io_eventfd_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - if (likely(!ctx->cq_ev_fd))
> - return false;
> + struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + /* rcu_dereference ctx->io_ev_fd once and use it for both for checking and eventfd_signal */
> + ev_fd = rcu_dereference(ctx->io_ev_fd);
> +
> + if (likely(!ev_fd))
> + goto out;
> if (READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq_flags) & IORING_CQ_EVENTFD_DISABLED)
> - return false;
> - return !ctx->eventfd_async || io_wq_current_is_worker();
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!ctx->eventfd_async || io_wq_current_is_worker())
> + eventfd_signal(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd, 1);
> +
> +out:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
This still needs what we discussed in v3, something ala:
/*
* This will potential race with eventfd registration, but that's
* always going to be the case if there is IO inflight while an eventfd
* descriptor is being registered.
*/
if (!rcu_dereference_raw(ctx->io_ev_fd))
return;
rcu_read_lock();
...
which I think is cheap enough and won't hit sparse complaints. The
> @@ -9353,35 +9370,70 @@ static int __io_sqe_buffers_update(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>
> static int io_eventfd_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
> {
> + struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
> __s32 __user *fds = arg;
> - int fd;
> + int fd, ret;
>
> - if (ctx->cq_ev_fd)
> - return -EBUSY;
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->ev_fd_lock);
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + if (rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd, lockdep_is_held(&ctx->ev_fd_lock))) {
> + rcu_barrier();
> + if(rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd, lockdep_is_held(&ctx->ev_fd_lock)))
> + goto out;
> + }
I wonder if we can get away with assigning ctx->io_ev_fd to NULL when we
do the call_rcu(). The struct itself will remain valid as long as we're
under rcu_read_lock() protection, so I think we'd be fine? If we do
that, then we don't need any rcu_barrier() or synchronize_rcu() calls,
as we can register a new one while the previous one is still being
killed.
Hmm?
> static int io_eventfd_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - if (ctx->cq_ev_fd) {
> - eventfd_ctx_put(ctx->cq_ev_fd);
> - ctx->cq_ev_fd = NULL;
> - return 0;
> + struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->ev_fd_lock);
> + ev_fd = rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd, lockdep_is_held(&ctx->ev_fd_lock));
> + if (ev_fd) {
> + call_rcu(&ev_fd->rcu, io_eventfd_put);
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> }
> + ret = -ENXIO;
>
> - return -ENXIO;
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->ev_fd_lock);
> + return ret;
> }
I also think that'd be cleaner without the goto:
{
struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd;
int ret;
mutex_lock(&ctx->ev_fd_lock);
ev_fd = rcu_dereference_protected(ctx->io_ev_fd,
lockdep_is_held(&ctx->ev_fd_lock));
if (ev_fd) {
call_rcu(&ev_fd->rcu, io_eventfd_put);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->ev_fd_lock);
return 0;
}
mutex_unlock(&ctx->ev_fd_lock);
return -ENXIO;
}
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 18:24 [PATCH v4 0/3] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce in io_uring_register for eventfd opcodes Usama Arif
2022-02-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] io_uring: remove trace for eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-03 18:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-02-03 19:05 ` [External] " Usama Arif
2022-02-03 19:12 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-03 23:37 ` Usama Arif
2022-02-03 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce for IORING_REGISTER_EVENTFD_ASYNC Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox