From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF0CC433E2 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 21:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F204320796 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 21:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="a3Ap6b6F" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728257AbgIEV7A (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2020 17:59:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38886 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728103AbgIEV67 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Sep 2020 17:58:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F99CC061244 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id v15so6151210pgh.6 for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 14:58:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uf9V0JznqswddJGc8rrf+pAyXDRkpGKbUcaFIT0uMdU=; b=a3Ap6b6FdVvbQgRsCMgS0mKx8J97sDTGlH1iJYiv6JqvjuoPNLsfp4Byh0090zp6Yn 00adFJ3OJs4Kv2fSBOoCDudumCGehzgahDz8nrH4eo5Kg3MzHiIe79HLONabkgLKagAG PpBMPaFNnhbowNwrg+PPkHbdV/ONXsk/Et381g4wiMBozZKlMC+Ctr/KbGJ4GK5V+Ih8 wS4unLJBLl3IEjAsr1OLpfBaHrvaQuQTuAdQ3B2W80eGuptLUxpvFg9vr1u6feJWPQ8Q hMFLcmVzeVdhdUOMeVnmv0U+f8+YAEd4lNchwPRn4frPsI8XNtLFMR10edYFYlunmKsO lkEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uf9V0JznqswddJGc8rrf+pAyXDRkpGKbUcaFIT0uMdU=; b=rulG6x8UyKW8DsMv5dEj/CR0f+WLNarDOF773XG4kJmQf3IjMTYjX8icRrYPwx4Chc Nm+RuDLHe+hx8lKTSW2ND777Xjasrpv3lXw7hXxLcexNS3oW3IDAHFiqCeIKep2cB7KJ OjxRGem+P8acA0d6C2ZlguaBHQnUkPDKbwRC3R0KnKkpqUA3BKplEOCnnCJFfHrhgNyn 4xf8SOmZ+9KVqwO53QoWMmM9mRJI5tPHd6nvAyTYm/5+m13mTEkcd2wxF37ekujsM+Ft BGdmxRfktcqID9Wiiz4On8TSv38eB8KP2B9tNmByVcvyhtm+ZmXJrEgfPO5ixgdjkOk9 2V0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533U8x5HCWKg+bhvBHKyJmIFwRQ3R/oi/qceaoCPkzw5Wsec5ca3 nFWJmnQ7GRzuhVn8GegnA2IUbkfY6+IIq83y X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4hcIsEndcIYrFw8oBpU0QY4OofknVVrdJVw5vwyOvVtl7U/e9O/IlHjKlU1JNi3u4tM7VqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:f904:: with SMTP id o4mr13887240pfh.14.1599343138245; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 14:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.182] ([66.219.217.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a26sm10412596pfn.93.2020.09.05.14.58.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Sep 2020 14:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iov remapping hardening To: Pavel Begunkov , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <8381061c-e2e8-6550-9537-2d3f7a759e92@kernel.dk> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:58:56 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: io-uring-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 9/5/20 3:45 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > This cleans bits around iov remapping. The patches were initially > for-5.9, but if you want it for 5.10 let me know, I'll rebase. Yeah let's aim these for 5.10 - look fine to me, but would rather avoid any extra churn if at all possible. -- Jens Axboe