* [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
@ 2025-10-29 23:16 David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, netdev
Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
netdev ops must be called under instance lock or rtnl_lock, but
io_register_zcrx_ifq() isn't doing this for netdev_queue_get_dma_dev().
Fix this by taking the instance lock using netdev_get_by_index_lock().
netdev_get_by_index_lock() isn't exported by default, so the first patch
is a prep patch to export this under linux/netdevice.h.
Extended the instance lock section to include attaching a memory
provider. Could not move io_zcrx_create_area() outside, since the dmabuf
codepath IORING_ZCRX_AREA_DMABUF requires ifq->dev. Happy to do whatever
here, either keep this extended section or relock for net_mp_open_rxq().
v2:
- add Fixes tag
- export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
- use netdev_get_by_index_lock() + netdev_hold()
- extend lock section to include net_mp_open_rxq()
David Wei (2):
net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance
lock
include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
io_uring/zcrx.c | 15 +++++++++------
net/core/dev.c | 1 +
net/core/dev.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
2025-10-29 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
@ 2025-10-29 23:16 ` David Wei
2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, netdev
Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
Need to call netdev_get_by_index_lock() from io_uring/zcrx.c, but it is
currently private to net. Export the function in linux/netdevice.h.
Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
net/core/dev.c | 1 +
net/core/dev.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index d1a687444b27..77c46a2823ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3401,6 +3401,7 @@ struct net_device *dev_get_by_index(struct net *net, int ifindex);
struct net_device *__dev_get_by_index(struct net *net, int ifindex);
struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index(struct net *net, int ifindex,
netdevice_tracker *tracker, gfp_t gfp);
+struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex);
struct net_device *netdev_get_by_name(struct net *net, const char *name,
netdevice_tracker *tracker, gfp_t gfp);
struct net_device *netdev_get_by_flags_rcu(struct net *net, netdevice_tracker *tracker,
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 2acfa44927da..7e4ef9a915f9 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1089,6 +1089,7 @@ struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex)
return __netdev_put_lock(dev, net);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_get_by_index_lock);
struct net_device *
netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, int ifindex)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index 900880e8b5b4..df8a90fe89f8 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct napi_struct *
netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id);
-struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex);
struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net);
struct net_device *
netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
2025-10-29 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei
@ 2025-10-29 23:16 ` David Wei
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, netdev
Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
netdev ops must be called under instance lock or rtnl_lock, but
io_register_zcrx_ifq() isn't doing this for netdev_queue_get_dma_dev().
Fix this by taking the instance lock using netdev_get_by_index_lock().
Extended the instance lock section to include attaching a memory
provider. Could not move io_zcrx_create_area() outside, since the dmabuf
codepath IORING_ZCRX_AREA_DMABUF requires ifq->dev.
Fixes: 59b8b32ac8d4 ("io_uring/zcrx: add support for custom DMA devices")
Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
---
io_uring/zcrx.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c
index a816f5902091..5599883f8941 100644
--- a/io_uring/zcrx.c
+++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c
@@ -599,27 +599,28 @@ int io_register_zcrx_ifq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
if (ret)
goto err;
- ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx,
- &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx);
if (!ifq->netdev) {
ret = -ENODEV;
- goto err;
+ goto netdev_unlock;
}
ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq);
if (!ifq->dev) {
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- goto err;
+ goto netdev_unlock;
}
+ netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
get_device(ifq->dev);
ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area);
if (ret)
- goto err;
+ goto netdev_unlock;
mp_param.mp_ops = &io_uring_pp_zc_ops;
mp_param.mp_priv = ifq;
- ret = net_mp_open_rxq(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq, &mp_param);
+ ret = __net_mp_open_rxq(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq, &mp_param, NULL);
+ netdev_unlock(ifq->netdev);
if (ret)
goto err;
ifq->if_rxq = reg.if_rxq;
@@ -640,6 +641,8 @@ int io_register_zcrx_ifq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
goto err;
}
return 0;
+netdev_unlock:
+ netdev_unlock(ifq->netdev);
err:
scoped_guard(mutex, &ctx->mmap_lock)
xa_erase(&ctx->zcrx_ctxs, id);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei
@ 2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-10-29 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Wei
Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:53 -0700 David Wei wrote:
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_get_by_index_lock);
I don't think io_uring can be a module? No need to export
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
@ 2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-10-29 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Wei
Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:54 -0700 David Wei wrote:
> + ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx);
> if (!ifq->netdev) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err;
> + goto netdev_unlock;
> }
>
> ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq);
> if (!ifq->dev) {
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - goto err;
> + goto netdev_unlock;
> }
> + netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
> get_device(ifq->dev);
>
> ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area);
> if (ret)
> - goto err;
> + goto netdev_unlock;
Without looking at larger context this looks sus.
You're jumping to the same label before and after you took the ref on
the netdev..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-10-30 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
On 2025-10-29 16:54, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:54 -0700 David Wei wrote:
>> + ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx);
>> if (!ifq->netdev) {
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> - goto err;
>> + goto netdev_unlock;
>> }
>>
>> ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq);
>> if (!ifq->dev) {
>> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> - goto err;
>> + goto netdev_unlock;
>> }
>> + netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
>> get_device(ifq->dev);
>>
>> ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto err;
>> + goto netdev_unlock;
>
> Without looking at larger context this looks sus.
> You're jumping to the same label before and after you took the ref on
> the netdev..
Sorry you're right, and actually io_zcrx_ifq_free() does netdev_put()
unconditionally. I'll correct this in v3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-10-30 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
On 2025-10-29 16:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:53 -0700 David Wei wrote:
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_get_by_index_lock);
>
> I don't think io_uring can be a module? No need to export
Got it, will remove.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-30 1:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-29 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei
2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox