From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add io_uring_enter(2) fixed file support
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:41:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/3/22 10:18 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/3/22 9:31 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/3/22 7:40 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 3/3/22 7:36 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> The only potential oddity here is that the fd passed back is not a
>>>> legitimate fd. io_uring does support poll(2) on its file descriptor, so
>>>> that could cause some confusion even if I don't think anyone actually
>>>> does poll(2) on io_uring.
>>>
>>> Side note - the only implication here is that we then likely can't make
>>> the optimized behavior the default, it has to be an IORING_SETUP_REG
>>> flag which tells us that the application is aware of this limitation.
>>> Though I guess close(2) might mess with that too... Hmm.
>>
>> Not sure I can find a good approach for that. Tried out your patch and
>> made some fixes:
>>
>> - Missing free on final tctx free
>> - Rename registered_files to registered_rings
>> - Fix off-by-ones in checking max registration count
>> - Use kcalloc
>> - Rename ENTER_FIXED_FILE -> ENTER_REGISTERED_RING
>> - Don't pass in tctx to io_uring_unreg_ringfd()
>> - Get rid of forward declaration for adding tctx node
>> - Get rid of extra file pointer in io_uring_enter()
>> - Fix deadlock in io_ringfd_register()
>> - Use io_uring_rsrc_update rather than add a new struct type
>
> - Allow multiple register/unregister instead of enforcing just 1 at the
> time
> - Check for it really being a ring fd when registering
>
> For different batch counts, nice improvements are seen. Roughly:
>
> Batch==1 15% faster
> Batch==2 13% faster
> Batch==4 11% faster
>
> This is just in microbenchmarks where the fdget/fdput play a bigger
> factor, but it will certainly help with real world situations where
> batching is more limited than in benchmarks.
In trying this out in applications, I think the better registration API
is to allow io_uring to pick the offset. The application doesn't care,
it's just a magic integer there. And if we allow io_uring to pick it,
then that makes things a lot easier to deal with.
For registration, pass in an array of io_uring_rsrc_update structs, just
filling in the ring_fd in the data field. Return value is number of ring
fds registered, and up->offset now contains the chosen offset for each
of them.
Unregister is the same struct, but just with offset filled in.
For applications using io_uring, which is all of them as far as I'm
aware, we can also easily hide this. This means we can get the optimized
behavior by default.
What do you think?
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ad3e0b0ab3b9..e3be96e81164 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -466,6 +466,11 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
};
};
+/*
+ * Arbitrary limit, can be raised if need be
+ */
+#define IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX 16
+
struct io_uring_task {
/* submission side */
int cached_refs;
@@ -481,6 +486,7 @@ struct io_uring_task {
struct io_wq_work_list task_list;
struct io_wq_work_list prior_task_list;
struct callback_head task_work;
+ struct file **registered_rings;
bool task_running;
};
@@ -8806,8 +8812,16 @@ static __cold int io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *task,
if (unlikely(!tctx))
return -ENOMEM;
+ tctx->registered_rings = kcalloc(IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX,
+ sizeof(struct file *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (unlikely(!tctx->registered_rings)) {
+ kfree(tctx);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
ret = percpu_counter_init(&tctx->inflight, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
+ kfree(tctx->registered_rings);
kfree(tctx);
return ret;
}
@@ -8816,6 +8830,7 @@ static __cold int io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *task,
if (IS_ERR(tctx->io_wq)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(tctx->io_wq);
percpu_counter_destroy(&tctx->inflight);
+ kfree(tctx->registered_rings);
kfree(tctx);
return ret;
}
@@ -8840,6 +8855,7 @@ void __io_uring_free(struct task_struct *tsk)
WARN_ON_ONCE(tctx->io_wq);
WARN_ON_ONCE(tctx->cached_refs);
+ kfree(tctx->registered_rings);
percpu_counter_destroy(&tctx->inflight);
kfree(tctx);
tsk->io_uring = NULL;
@@ -10061,6 +10077,121 @@ void __io_uring_cancel(bool cancel_all)
io_uring_cancel_generic(cancel_all, NULL);
}
+void io_uring_unreg_ringfd(void)
+{
+ struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX; i++) {
+ if (tctx->registered_rings[i]) {
+ fput(tctx->registered_rings[i]);
+ tctx->registered_rings[i] = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static int io_ring_add_registered_fd(struct io_uring_task *tctx, int fd)
+{
+ struct file *file;
+ int offset;
+
+ for (offset = 0; offset < IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX; offset++) {
+ if (tctx->registered_rings[offset])
+ continue;
+
+ file = fget(fd);
+ if (!file) {
+ return -EBADF;
+ } else if (file->f_op != &io_uring_fops) {
+ fput(file);
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ tctx->registered_rings[offset] = file;
+ return offset;
+ }
+
+ return -EBUSY;
+}
+
+static int io_ringfd_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
+ unsigned nr_args)
+{
+ struct io_uring_rsrc_update reg;
+ struct io_uring_task *tctx;
+ int ret, nr, i;
+
+ if (!nr_args || nr_args > IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ ret = io_uring_add_tctx_node(ctx);
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ tctx = current->io_uring;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
+ if (copy_from_user(®, arg, sizeof(reg))) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (reg.offset >= IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ ret = io_ring_add_registered_fd(tctx, reg.data);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
+
+ reg.offset = ret;
+ if (copy_to_user(arg, ®, sizeof(reg))) {
+ fput(tctx->registered_rings[reg.offset]);
+ tctx->registered_rings[reg.offset] = NULL;
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ arg += sizeof(reg);
+ nr++;
+ }
+
+ return nr ? nr : ret;
+}
+
+static int io_ringfd_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
+ unsigned nr_args)
+{
+ struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
+ struct io_uring_rsrc_update reg;
+ int ret, nr, i;
+
+ if (!nr_args || nr_args > IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!tctx)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = nr = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
+ if (copy_from_user(®, arg, sizeof(reg))) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (reg.offset >= IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (tctx->registered_rings[reg.offset]) {
+ fput(tctx->registered_rings[reg.offset]);
+ tctx->registered_rings[reg.offset] = NULL;
+ }
+ arg += sizeof(reg);
+ nr++;
+ }
+
+ return nr ? nr : ret;
+}
+
static void *io_uring_validate_mmap_request(struct file *file,
loff_t pgoff, size_t sz)
{
@@ -10191,12 +10322,23 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
io_run_task_work();
if (unlikely(flags & ~(IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS | IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAKEUP |
- IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAIT | IORING_ENTER_EXT_ARG)))
+ IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAIT | IORING_ENTER_EXT_ARG |
+ IORING_ENTER_REGISTERED_RING)))
return -EINVAL;
- f = fdget(fd);
- if (unlikely(!f.file))
- return -EBADF;
+ if (flags & IORING_ENTER_REGISTERED_RING) {
+ struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
+
+ if (fd >= IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX || !tctx)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ f.file = tctx->registered_rings[fd];
+ if (unlikely(!f.file))
+ return -EBADF;
+ } else {
+ f = fdget(fd);
+ if (unlikely(!f.file))
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (unlikely(f.file->f_op != &io_uring_fops))
@@ -10270,7 +10412,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
out:
percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
out_fput:
- fdput(f);
+ if (!(flags & IORING_ENTER_REGISTERED_RING))
+ fdput(f);
return submitted ? submitted : ret;
}
@@ -11160,6 +11303,12 @@ static int __io_uring_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned opcode,
break;
ret = io_register_iowq_max_workers(ctx, arg);
break;
+ case IORING_REGISTER_RING_FDS:
+ ret = io_ringfd_register(ctx, arg, nr_args);
+ break;
+ case IORING_UNREGISTER_RING_FDS:
+ ret = io_ringfd_unregister(ctx, arg, nr_args);
+ break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring.h b/include/linux/io_uring.h
index 649a4d7c241b..1814e698d861 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -9,11 +9,14 @@
struct sock *io_uring_get_socket(struct file *file);
void __io_uring_cancel(bool cancel_all);
void __io_uring_free(struct task_struct *tsk);
+void io_uring_unreg_ringfd(void);
static inline void io_uring_files_cancel(void)
{
- if (current->io_uring)
+ if (current->io_uring) {
+ io_uring_unreg_ringfd();
__io_uring_cancel(false);
+ }
}
static inline void io_uring_task_cancel(void)
{
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index 787f491f0d2a..42b2fe84dbcd 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -257,10 +257,11 @@ struct io_cqring_offsets {
/*
* io_uring_enter(2) flags
*/
-#define IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS (1U << 0)
-#define IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAKEUP (1U << 1)
-#define IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAIT (1U << 2)
-#define IORING_ENTER_EXT_ARG (1U << 3)
+#define IORING_ENTER_GETEVENTS (1U << 0)
+#define IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAKEUP (1U << 1)
+#define IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAIT (1U << 2)
+#define IORING_ENTER_EXT_ARG (1U << 3)
+#define IORING_ENTER_REGISTERED_RING (1U << 4)
/*
* Passed in for io_uring_setup(2). Copied back with updated info on success
@@ -325,6 +326,10 @@ enum {
/* set/get max number of io-wq workers */
IORING_REGISTER_IOWQ_MAX_WORKERS = 19,
+ /* register/unregister io_uring fd with the ring */
+ IORING_REGISTER_RING_FDS = 20,
+ IORING_UNREGISTER_RING_FDS = 21,
+
/* this goes last */
IORING_REGISTER_LAST
};
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 5:28 [PATCH] io_uring: add io_uring_enter(2) fixed file support Xiaoguang Wang
2022-03-03 8:56 ` Hao Xu
2022-03-03 13:38 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-03 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-03 14:40 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-03 16:31 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-03 17:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-03 20:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-03-03 21:19 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 0:07 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 13:39 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2022-03-04 13:44 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 15:16 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2022-03-04 15:22 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-08 8:38 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2022-03-08 13:10 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-03 22:24 ` Vito Caputo
2022-03-03 22:26 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 1:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-04 2:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 2:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-04 2:35 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-04 2:43 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 1:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-04 2:19 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-04 2:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-03-04 3:03 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-21 14:16 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox