From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 2/2] nvme: optimise io_uring passthrough completion
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 13:31:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/17/23 6:32 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/17/23 08:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 01:54:43PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> Use IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE via iou_cmd_exec_in_task_lazy() for passthrough
>>> commands completion. It further delays the execution of task_work for
>>> DEFER_TASKRUN until there are enough of task_work items queued to meet
>>> the waiting criteria, which reduces the number of wake ups we issue.
>>
>> Why wouldn't you just do that unconditionally for
>> io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task?
>
> 1) ublk does secondary batching and so may produce multiple cqes,
> that's not supported. I believe Ming sent patches removing it,
> but I'd rather not deal with conflicts for now.
Ming, what's the status of those patches? Looks like we'll end up
with a dependency regardless of the ordering of these. Since these
patches are here now, sanest approach seems to move forward with
this series and defer the conflict resolving to the ublk side.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 12:54 [PATCH for-next 0/2] Enable IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE for passthrough Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-15 12:54 ` [PATCH for-next 1/2] io_uring/cmd: add cmd lazy tw wake helper Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-16 10:00 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-05-16 18:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-17 10:33 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-05-17 12:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-19 15:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-15 12:54 ` [PATCH for-next 2/2] nvme: optimise io_uring passthrough completion Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-17 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 12:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-17 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 13:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-17 13:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-17 20:11 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-17 19:31 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-05-18 2:15 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-16 11:42 ` [PATCH for-next 0/2] Enable IOU_F_TWQ_LAZY_WAKE for passthrough Anuj gupta
2023-05-16 18:38 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-05-25 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox